T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3730.1 | Some possibilities | TIS::GRUHN | | Tue Oct 05 1993 11:33 | 79 |
3730.2 | Gruhn Eats Crow | TIS::GRUHN | | Tue Oct 05 1993 11:36 | 111 |
3730.3 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Oct 05 1993 14:20 | 7 |
3730.4 | Hmmmmmmmmm | TIS::GRUHN | | Tue Oct 05 1993 14:52 | 5 |
3730.5 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Wed Oct 06 1993 10:04 | 27 |
3730.6 | | SUBURB::POWELLM | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be! | Wed Oct 06 1993 10:12 | 6 |
3730.7 | thanks for the insight.. | CALDEC::NUCKLES | client / surfer applications specialist | Thu Oct 07 1993 16:39 | 20 |
3730.8 | | AKOCOA::HADNEY | | Thu Oct 07 1993 16:40 | 3 |
3730.9 | Use an Impedance bridge | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Oct 08 1993 09:31 | 5 |
3730.10 | And plot it on a Smith Chart | TIS::GRUHN | | Fri Oct 08 1993 10:26 | 12 |
3730.11 | and now for something completely different... | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Fri Dec 17 1993 10:45 | 84 |
3730.12 | One more! | TIS::GRUHN | | Fri Dec 17 1993 12:05 | 10 |
3730.13 | Woops! | TIS::GRUHN | | Fri Dec 17 1993 12:11 | 5 |
3730.14 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Fri Dec 17 1993 13:08 | 9 |
3730.15 | Sounds like the bennies can be had easily | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Why not ask why? | Mon Dec 20 1993 10:33 | 13 |
3730.16 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Dec 20 1993 10:56 | 9 |
3730.17 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:44 | 33 |
3730.18 | definitely one of the better ones | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:09 | 11 |
3730.19 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Why not ask why? | Wed Dec 22 1993 08:28 | 7 |
3730.20 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Wed Dec 22 1993 08:49 | 15 |
3730.21 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Why not ask why? | Wed Dec 22 1993 12:19 | 8 |
3730.22 | | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Wed Dec 22 1993 13:48 | 7 |
3730.23 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Wed Dec 22 1993 15:15 | 26 |
3730.24 | | FORTY2::SHIPMAN | MOG | Tue Jan 04 1994 09:47 | 7 |
3730.25 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Tue Jan 04 1994 11:06 | 5 |
3730.26 | Cinchkabel zu dir meine Liebe! | UFHIS::JMASLEN | The wheels fallen off your day yet?! | Fri Apr 08 1994 09:07 | 61 |
3730.27 | | CAPNET::WCLARK | we be jibin' | Fri Apr 08 1994 09:24 | 3 |
3730.28 | more ignorant questions | WAMMEY::NUCKLES | client / surfer applications specialist | Thu Dec 08 1994 19:04 | 12 |
3730.29 | | CAPNET::PSM044::wclark | | Fri Dec 09 1994 08:47 | 83 |
3730.30 | getting closer ... | WAMMEY::NUCKLES | client / surfer applications specialist | Fri Dec 09 1994 15:01 | 23 |
3730.31 | | WAMMEY::NUCKLES | client / surfer applications specialist | Fri Dec 09 1994 15:23 | 8 |
3730.32 | | CAPNET::PSM044::wclark | | Fri Dec 09 1994 15:49 | 22 |
3730.33 | Voltage level mismatch | IOSG::CARLIN | Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England | Fri Apr 04 1997 12:40 | 13 |
| A bit of a low-fi question I'm afraid.
My daughter has an old (but good) Panasonic music centre (SG-4000) and
a new Panasonic personal CD-Player (SL-S138). We would like to play the
CDs through the music centre, but the details are as follows:
CD-Player output is 600 mV 50k
Music Centre input is 150mV 47k
So, no impedance mismatch, but is there something simple I can do about
the voltage level mismatch?
Dick
|
3730.34 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Apr 04 1997 18:09 | 9 |
| It looks as if your input is meant for a phonograph turntable, not a
"line-level input". What's worse is that there will be an equalization
curve applied to the input so your CD will sound awful. I have seen
a description of a box designed to make this work, but I expect it's
expensive.
Unless the Music Centre has a separate line-level input, I'd say "forget it".
Steve
|
3730.35 | | IOSG::CARLIN | Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England | Mon Apr 07 1997 07:12 | 10 |
| Thanks Steve
Sorry, I forgot to mention that the DIN socket on the back of the music
centre is marked TAPE Input/Output. I assume it is for connecting a
better tape deck and the "Input" is for monitoring while recording
externally.
Does this alter things?
Dick
|
3730.36 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Apr 07 1997 17:37 | 6 |
| In that case, I have no clue. 150mv is much too low for a line-level input.
The small difference in impedance won't really matter. You might try it
anyway, just keep the volume low on the CD player (assuming it has variable
output) - otherwise, it will overload the input.
Steve
|
3730.37 | Tape HEAD inputs, maybe? | SMURF::PBECK | Who put the bop in the hale-de-bop-de-bop? | Mon Apr 07 1997 23:55 | 9 |
| If it was a really old unit, I might suspect the low-level input
marked "tape" was for a tape head output (some old reel transports
didn't have or could bypass their preamp stages). Haven't seen one
of those in ages, though.
I agree that there should be no harm in trying it if the source has
a variable output level ... even overloading the input is more
likely to clip and distort than actually fry something (but you
never know; hard clipping can do nasties to tweeters).
|
3730.38 | | BUSY::SLAB | Black No. 1 | Tue Apr 08 1997 00:45 | 3 |
|
Use the headphone output instead of the line-level output.
|