T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5476.1 | i don't think it will work | GIDDAY::STRAUSS | talking through my binoculars | Tue May 27 1997 18:59 | 11 |
| Hi Manoel
I'm not certain, but I think it will not work.
If two print jobs are queued to the same server port, I think tey will
be mixed up together into one large, meaningless printout :-(
If I had a terminal server, I would test it. Can you test it yourself?
The results could be interesting.
leon
|
5476.2 | | wasted.zk3.dec.com::matt | The Code Warrior | Wed May 28 1997 11:06 | 3 |
| If these are two separate ttys, it'll work just fine. To the terminal
server, it just looks like two system vying for the same port. The
terminal server knows how to deal with that.
|
5476.3 | | NABETH::alan | Dr. File System's Home for Wayward Inodes. | Wed May 28 1997 11:56 | 3 |
| And, even if it didn't, I think the lpd subsystem has provisions
for two queues using a common lock file to control access to the
same device. I've never tried this though.
|
5476.4 | Little more detail. | VAXRIO::16.179.32.123::Manoel | | Wed May 28 1997 15:08 | 11 |
|
Ok, folks.
In fact it is working, but sometimes one of the queues just stuck,
with a status wainting for it to became ready.
Then the customer has to stop and start the queue and it starts to
work again.
I'll talk to them that it is not supported.
Thanks.
Manoel F. Abreu Neto (MCS/DEC@Rio)
|