T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4215.1 | | VMSNET::P_NUNEZ | | Wed Mar 19 1997 13:59 | 26 |
| Tom,
Look around this conference in recent notes and you'll see issues
regarding multiple sessions from NT clients and issues around file
access exactly as you describe. If you look at these clients sessions
using $ NET SESSIONS, you'll likely see one is connected as GUEST
(which is why they suddenly get the access denied error).
Recent notes in the JAMIN::PATHWORKS32 conference are discussing it as
well. I think there's a workaround (ie, if one's workgroup name is NOT
the same as the domain name)...
For your customer, can't he get away from using /USER:<group> when
connecting to the shares? He should just use LANMAN user groups (1 per
dept) and then make the appropriate users members of that group. Then
assign that group the appropriate permissions to the appropriate
directories w/i the shares.
Then the user logs on to the domain as a normal user would and when the
net use command is issued that user's credentials are passed for ALL
connections to any server in the domain. But I'm not sure this is
enough to avoid the multiple session issue.
HTH,
Paul
|
4215.2 | Seen and reported | VMSNET::ALLERTON | Episode d'Azur | Fri Mar 21 1997 11:15 | 10 |
| Tom,
There have been a number of cld's generated recently for 5.0e and
"phantom" (blank) or guest sessions (tied to NT 4.0 computernames) that
displace an initially established user context session for a given
computer...$ net sessions command will bear this out (a \\computername
listed with a GUEST or (BLANK) user session context only).
Steve
|
4215.3 | | CPEEDY::FLEURY | | Fri Mar 21 1997 12:37 | 8 |
|
Some of the problems reported here are fixed in V50E-ECO1. We have
since found another instance where this symptom can appear. We believe
that we have a fix for this too. We will be testing this shortly.
Note: The final complete fix will be a patch to ECO1.
Dan
|
4215.4 | Waiting for ECO1 | CUJO::TOBIASSEN | Ride a Bicycle for Fun & Fitness | Mon Mar 24 1997 11:28 | 4 |
| Thank you for the replies. We will wait patiently for ECO1.
Tom
|
4215.5 | | TKTVFS::ANAZAWA_H | NO SKIN OFF MY ASS | Sat Mar 29 1997 23:41 | 10 |
| hi, Dan
> Note: The final complete fix will be a patch to ECO1.
really?
Yesterday, my customer version up to V5.0E-eco1 from V5.0D-eco3.
greate "PHANTOM" session still appear!
All user can't access file from client (WNT V3.51).
/ana
|
4215.6 | Fix is a PATCH to ECO1. | CPEEDY::FLEURY | | Mon Mar 31 1997 08:57 | 6 |
| re: .5
Please re-read my original reply. I stated that the final fix is in a
PATCH to ECO1. This patch is now available via the IPMT process.
Dan
|
4215.7 | sorry... | TKTVFS::ANAZAWA_H | NO SKIN OFF MY ASS | Wed Apr 02 1997 12:01 | 5 |
| > -< Fix is a PATCH to ECO1. >-
I misunderstood, try to get a new PWRK$LMSRV.EXE .
Thank you.
/ana
|