Title: | Windows NT For Alpha AXP |
Moderator: | TARKIN::LIN EIBER |
Created: | Mon Sep 27 1993 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1058 |
Total number of notes: | 4567 |
We're headed to a customer soon who asks the question, "Why Alpha over Intel?" I pulled all of the performance info, and the application characterizations, but what I'm not finding is information on why an multi-processor Alpha server is any better/faster/superior than a multi-processor Intel server (specifically Compaq). I can throw out stuff like "faster context switching", but what I'd like to provide are some concrete reasons to run NT on Alpha! They primarily run Lotus Notes, and file/print services. Any ideas? Thanks, Sharon
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1036.1 | DECC::OUELLETTE | mudseason into blackfly season | Fri Apr 25 1997 17:36 | 4 | |
> Any ideas? Bring some server benchmarks. TPC for database stuff. WebStones for serving stuff & the Performance group has others. | |||||
1036.2 | VLM | STAR::COPE | Mon Apr 28 1997 07:19 | 7 | |
One advantage: VLM. If they're running large databases, etc, then they will be able to enjoy the expandability and performance gains when 64-bit NT comes out, without having to buy a new system. If they go with Intel and decide they need VLM, they'll have to buy a new Merced system (in 1999?) | |||||
1036.3 | white paper or??? | DECIDE::LANGFELDT | Mon Apr 28 1997 10:00 | 6 | |
Any pointers to a white paper or something of that sort? I came out of the Unix world, so I know all of the VLM arguments. Sure could use something concrete to leave with my customer. Thanks! | |||||
1036.4 | PCBUOA::KRATZ | Mon Apr 28 1997 13:44 | 15 | ||
Stay away from: TPC/C (Alpha's bcache too small), file server (ex: Netbench reviews), and some web server (ex: May Byte magazine) benchmarks. Alpha has little to no performance advantage and price/ performance is awful. Alpha's floating point plays no part, and 64 bitness is useful only for >2Gb configs, so Alpha gets hurt by not being able to use its best attributes. Use: Lotus NotesBench (3300 on a 2x 4100 5/466 is 50% faster than Intel's 2xPPro 2100 score), SPEC throughput numbers, and I believe the 4100 also had some good Exchange server numbers (altho that hasn't stopped internal groups from switching their Exchange server to Intel for reliability reasons). .02 Kratz | |||||
1036.5 | DECCXL::OUELLETTE | mudseason into blackfly season | Mon Apr 28 1997 15:01 | 1 | |
Marc Slater may have some useful benchmarks and/or other Server data. | |||||
1036.6 | Some ideas... | VNZV01::IRODRIGUEZ | Fri May 02 1997 07:59 | 28 | |
If you can (maybe you are not recognized for that), keep in mind not all customers are for NT/Alpha. Our Prioris line could be your more competitive arm against COMPAQ. I found the AlphaServer 4xxx is almost the only Alpha that you can use against COMPAQ. Lower end AlphaServers can be sold if customer is installed base, they are part of a big project where others are the decision points, strong partner relationship is in place but not for perfomance reasons. Recently in a not friedly account for us, the customer decided Alpha 4xxx instead of COMPAQ, HP or Digital Intel. The main reasons were: Why Digital (Intel or Alpha)? 1) Better service, specially NT expertise. 2) Our cluster solution is better that COMPAQ`s, Notes scripts are available. 3) Nice complementary SW, like Networker, Altavista SW. Try to use a solution approach. Winning box to box with COMPAQ is very difficult. Why Alpha? 1) Customer needs of memory are 1+ GB. So you can sell near future 64-bit addressing. 2) Alpha 4xxx has the world record for Notes benchmark. 3) Alpha 4xxx has very nice I/O throughput. 2x64 bit PCI buses. Hope this helps, Ivan | |||||
1036.7 | AIM awards | PCBUOA::KRATZ | Fri May 09 1997 08:49 | 62 | |
Good message here for DIGITAL... Alpha best at some things, Intel best at others. Either way, we gotcha covered! Prioris Servers, AlphaServer Systems and AlphaStations Combine to Win 15 Awards -- Most Awards by a Single Vendor LAS VEGAS, May 8 /PRNewswire/ -- Reinforcing its leadership in price/performance enterprise solutions, Digital Equipment Corporation (NYSE: DEC) (Networld+InterOp booth # 5041), today received 15 awards at AIM Technology's Spring '97 Hot Iron Awards Ceremony held at Networld+InterOp. Digital's Prioris servers, AlphaServer systems and AlphaStations won awards in the performance and price/performance categories, for both Windows NT and UNIX environments. The award-winning Digital products included the Prioris ZX 6000 Series and the Prioris HX 6000 Series, Digital's AlphaServer 4100 and 8400 systems, and AlphaStation 500/333. Combined, Digital won more awards than any other vendor for the Spring '97 awards. "Receiving multiple AIM awards for our Prioris, AlphaServer systems and AlphaStations recognizes our unique ability to provide customers with industry-leading solutions -- from the workgroup throughout the enterprise," said Duane Dickhut, vice president of server products for Digital's Personal Computer Business Unit. "Customers are looking for true value, and that value is measured through price/performance. As the AIM Awards indicate, our line of Intel servers, AlphaServer systems and Alpha-based workstations set the standard, providing customers with the best solution in every price segment." Digital Hot Iron Awards for Spring 1997 include: -- Best Throughput Performer, Windows NT Domain Server, priced between $7,500 and $14,999 -- Digital Prioris HX 6200MP -- Best Price Performance, Windows NT Domain Server, priced between $15,000 and $24,999 -- Digital Prioris HX 6200MP (4 disk) -- Best Throughput Performer, Windows NT Domain Server, priced between $25,000 and $49,999 -- Digital Prioris ZX 6200MP/4 (1GB) -- Best Throughput Performer, Windows NT Domain Server, priced over $50,000 -- Digital Prioris ZX 6200MP/4 (1.5GB) -- Best Price Performance, Windows NT Domain Server, priced over $50,000 -- Digital Prioris ZX 6200MP/4 (1.5GB) -- Best Throughput Performer, UNIX Shared System, priced between $15,000 and $29,999 -- Digital Prioris HX 6200MP -- Best Price Performance, UNIX Shared System, priced between $15,000 and $29,999 -- Digital Prioris HX 6200MP -- Best Throughput Performer, UNIX Shared System, priced between $30,000 and $74,999 -- Digital Prioris ZX 6200MP/4 -- Best Throughput Performer, UNIX Shared System, priced between $75,000 and $149,999 -- Digital Prioris ZX 6200MP/4 (1536 MB) -- Best Price Performance, UNIX Shared System, priced between $75,000 and $149,999 -- Digital Prioris ZX 6200MP/4 (1536 MB) -- Best Price Performance, General Workstation Mix (UNIX), priced between $10,000 and $25,000 -- Digital AlphaStation 500/333 -- Best Performance, General Workstation Mix (UNIX), priced between $10,000 and $25,000 -- Digital AlphaStation 500/333 -- Best Performance, General Workstation Mix (UNIX), priced over $25,000 -- Digital AlphaServer 4100 5/466 -- Best Price Performance, Shared System Mix (UNIX), priced over $150,000 -- Digital AlphaServer 4100 5/400 -- Best Performance, Shared System Mix (UNIX) priced over $150,000 -- Digital AlphaServer 8400 5/350 Kratz | |||||
1036.8 | NT AlphaServers vs Intel | BLUFSH::MCCROREY | Tue May 13 1997 09:09 | 18 | |
The AIM awards are good news in general but how about some more info specific to Alpha NT servers. We have lots of UNIX benchmarks and .7 shows an AIM award for UNIX AlphaServers but like the base noter, I am interested in what advantages NT AlphaServers have over Intel servers. So far VLM has been listed. Is it true that this is only useful with a system configured with greater than 2 GBytes of physical memory and running the yet to be released Windows NT 5.0? Fast floating point has been mentioned. I can see how this helps workstations but are there NT server applications that make heavy use of this? What are they? What are the other NT Alphaserver advantages? .4 mentions that Notes and Exchange have good NT Alphaserver benchmarks. Why? Do these applications do anything special to take advantage of Alpha? Thanks to anyone who has answers! - Jack | |||||
1036.9 | What about software availability? | CHOWDA::GLICKMAN | writing from Newport,RI | Thu May 22 1997 09:28 | 10 |
Glad I stumbled upon this note. My customer keeps asking about this and is particularly fixated on this issue: Software availability. Doesn't software come out for Intel before Alpha for Windows NT? Can someone comment on this issue in regards to the operating system, other Microsoft products as well as third party products? Appreciating any discussion on this issue. | |||||
1036.10 | TURRIS::lspace.zko.dec.com::winalski | PLIT Happens... | Thu May 22 1997 13:27 | 9 | |
RE: .9 With regard to the operating system, Microsoft develops and releases NT for Intel and Alpha simultaneously. For other products, it varies. Visual C++ releases on Alpha generally a few weeks after the Intel release. --PSW | |||||
1036.11 | MPOS01::naiad.mpo.dec.com::mpos01::cerling | I'[email protected] | Tue May 27 1997 09:39 | 6 | |
For server-based products (SQL Server, SNA Server, SMS, IIS, Exchange, etc.) Microsoft, as part of the Alliance for Enterprise Computing, agreed to release these products at the same time on Alpha as on Intel. tgc |