[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Reliable Transaction Router |
|
Moderator: | TALER::DESHMUKH |
|
Created: | Tue Dec 12 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 695 |
Total number of notes: | 2564 |
684.0. "not transactional broadcast; transparent multi-partition enqueue/send" by AMCFAC::RABAHY (dtn 471-5160, outside 1-810-347-5160) Mon Mar 17 1997 18:45
Ok, I've figured it out. One reason the world wants transactional broadcast is
because it would give them transparent multi-partition enqueue/send.
So, give us what they want independent of transactional broadcast if that helps.
requester server 1 server 2
--------- -------- --------
$dcl_tx_prc/req $dcl_tx_prc/ser/key=1 $dcl_tx_prc/ser/key=2
$start_tx
$enq_tx $deq_tx $deq_tx
DB operation DB operation
loop:
$deq_tx $enq_tx/reply $enq_tx/reply
rollup
until_no_more:
$abort $deq_tx $deq_tx
Server 1 serves � the database, server 2 serves the other �. Someone wants to
know the total across the two parts. But we want to code this application to
handle a different number of partitions without recoding. Replies should be
coded as a loop until no more. The application will have to rollup the replies
into a final result.
Perhaps a new kind of server could do the rollups transparently to the requester?
requester server 1 server 2 rollup server
--------- -------- -------- -------------
$dcl_tx_prc/req $dcl_tx_prc/ser/key=1 $dcl_tx_prc/ser/key=2 $dcl_tx_prc/roll
$start_tx
$enq_tx $deq_tx $deq_tx
DB operation DB operation
loop:
$enq_tx/rollup $enq_tx/rollup $deq_tx
rollup
until_no_more:
$deq_tx $enq_tx/reply
$abort $deq_tx $deq_tx $deq_tx
If there's only one partition then an $enq_tx/rollup degenerates to an
$enq_tx/reply and the trip to the rollup server is avoided?
The problem is coding an application to learn the number of partitions and where
the lines between them are is a pain. It all gets worse if not impossible when
you want to consider transactional dynamic repartitioning.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|