[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Storage Library System |
|
Moderator: | COOKIE::REUTER |
|
Created: | Sun Oct 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2270 |
Total number of notes: | 7850 |
2251.0. "CLEANUP.LOG error messages" by CHEFS::RAVEN () Fri May 02 1997 05:57
Tape Clean Errors.
I have recently upgraded my SLS V2.4A server to V2.8A.
In tape clean log file (SLS$DATA:CLEANUP.LOG) I have noticed the following
errors. They appear against against 2 out of 3 tape purges.
Extract of error as shown below;
$ @SLS$SYSTEM:TAPEPURGEX "SLS" "9221" "RG71RW" "ALCD"
$!
$!* COPYRIGHT (c) 1992 BY DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, MAYNARD, MASSACHUSETTS.
$!
TAPEPURGEX - purging reel 9221, user RG71RW::SLS, flag ALCD, at 2-MAY-1997 03:03:06.04
%MAIL-E-USERDSABL, user SLS cannot receive new mail
%SLS-I-PURGED, volume 9221 purged at 2-MAY-1997 03:03:10
$ @SLS$SYSTEM:TAPEPURGEX "SLS" "9260" "RDGE21" "ALCD"
$!
$!* COPYRIGHT (c) 1992 BY DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, MAYNARD, MASSACHUSETTS.
$!
TAPEPURGEX - purging reel 9260, user RDGE21::SLS, flag ALCD, at 2-MAY-1997 03:03:11.18
%SLS-E-FREEFAIL, free directive failed
-SLS-E-NOVOLAL, no such volume or not allocated to requestor
%SLS-W-CMDSPNERR, error freeing $ @SLS$SYSTEM:TAPEPURGEX "!AD" "!AD" "!AD" "!AC"
%SLS-I-PURGED, volume 9260 purged at 2-MAY-1997 03:03:12
The error in question is the SLS-E-NOVOLAL message.....
When I check the tape database however ($Storage show vol nnnn) the tape is
updated from Allocated to Free status.
Anyone have any ideas of what causes this error?
Thanks
Kevin Raven
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2251.1 | One idea | KIDVAX::DESOURDIS | | Tue May 06 1997 09:59 | 5 |
| This is just a guess, but it sounds as if tape volume 9260 was already
deallocated by the time SLS$SYSTEM:TAPEPURGEX.COM got to it - the
error message quoted would be the one seen if this were the case.
Ron DeSourdis/CCS Storage Mgmt./MRO
|
2251.2 | | CHEFS::RAVEN | | Wed May 07 1997 04:07 | 7 |
| ;-1 This could make sense.
SLS runs on a two node cluster.
Thus does this mean that a Cleanup would run on both nodes , running at the
same time?
K.R.
|