T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2942.1 | re: -1 | PCBUOA::GKELLEY | | Wed Mar 05 1997 13:41 | 4 |
| Have you tried separating the two phone numbers with a couple of
commas?
glen kelley
|
2942.2 | | WRKSYS::THOMAS | Stop, look and listen | Wed Mar 05 1997 13:59 | 3 |
| Use the letter W to separate the FX number from the dial up number.
This causes the modem to wait for a dial tone before dialing the second
number like this nnn-nnnnW8,nnn-nnnn
|
2942.3 | | ICS::CHRISBELL | | Wed Mar 05 1997 14:03 | 6 |
| I used the "W" once but I didn't seperate it with a comma though. I'll
try that tonite. Do I just add the number like that too:
nnn-nnnnW8,nnn-nnnn
and not use the suffix?
|
2942.4 | | TARKIN::LIN | Bill Lin | Wed Mar 05 1997 14:16 | 8 |
| re: ICS::CHRISBELL
I live in a backward part of Massachusetts, which only has pulse
dialing. I use the following dial string:
ATDPmmm-mmmmWT8,nnn-nnnn
Note it starts with pulse dialing then switches to tone dialing.
|
2942.5 | This Works for ME | KYOSS1::POLAKOWSKI | One of Us is Over 40 | Wed Mar 05 1997 14:36 | 21 |
|
This dialing sequence works for me using KEATERM on my laptop.
The sequence includes the 800 access number the ten digit phone
number and my credit card number.
ATDT9,1800nnnnnnn,,,0nnnnnnnnnn,,,nnnnnnnnnnnnnn
I've also used the following trick on systems with modems
that will not let you enter a string as long as above.
This seems to work on Hayes compatible modems and allows
you to dial interactively.
ATDT9,1800nnnnnnn; <------ The ";" tells the modem to take input
from the terminal
OK <------ The modem sez OK when you can type again
ATDT0nnnnnnnnnn;
OK
ATDTnnnnnnnnnnnnnn <------ no ";" lets the modem do its thing
Ken
|
2942.6 | Comma, comma, comma chameleon? | SMURF::PBECK | Paul Beck | Wed Mar 05 1997 15:32 | 9 |
| I've run into some modems that don't (correctly) implement the W
command, and for these I find that three commas (set to the default
delay of 2 seconds) is the right incantation:
nnn-nnnn,,,8,nnn-nnnn
I remember some discussion about whether the pause after the '8' was
really needed, but it doesn't appear to hurt (unless you're really
impatient...).
|
2942.7 | | ICS::CHRISBELL | | Wed Mar 05 1997 19:08 | 5 |
| Thanx for all the info so far. I will try these tonite when I get home
and see if any of them work.
Chris.....
|
2942.8 | | WRKSYS::INGRAHAM | Andy | Wed Mar 05 1997 21:20 | 23 |
| Be aware that not all modems can handle very long dialing strings.
The modem stores the entire dialing string (up to the return character)
before acting on any of it. If your comm. program sends it too many
characters to fit into its buffer (whose size can vary from brand to
brand), the rest drop off the end and are lost.
Some years ago, when 1200 bps was king, a 16 character command buffer
wasn't uncommon, and it could be quite hard if not impossible to handle
situations like this where you dial one phone number, wait for a second
dialtone, then another number. Using two dial strings generally didn't
help, because the modem interprets the second string as a desire to start
over, and hangs up between the two.
In newer modems the buffers are probably much bigger so this isn't a likely
restriction ... but it's worth keeping in mind anyway.
My guess is your modem has been dialing both phone numbers all at once, and
the commas and/or "W" as suggested, should take care of that.
The "suffix" is just KEA's bookkeeping, and for making it easier for you if
you always append the same numbers on the end of your calls. You could
spell it all out and get the exact same effect.
|
2942.9 | It Works! | ICS::CHRISBELL | | Thu Mar 06 1997 12:18 | 11 |
| I got it to work! I used the following string:
nnn-nnnn,8-nnn-nnnn
I tried it with the "W" and it still wouldn't connect. Removed the "W"
and all is well.
Thanx for all the info...
Chris.....
|