T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2475.1 | | HUMANE::soemba.uto.dec.com::RIK | Mostly Harmless | Thu May 09 1996 04:40 | 41 |
2475.2 | thanks | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Thu May 09 1996 11:53 | 34 |
2475.3 | The Soundblaster may still work | LJSRV2::INGRAM | oops | Thu May 09 1996 12:32 | 7 |
2475.4 | nothing that says "IDE" | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Thu May 09 1996 13:17 | 17 |
2475.5 | another vote for SCSI | TARKIN::LIN | Bill Lin | Thu May 09 1996 13:30 | 15 |
2475.6 | did it... | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Fri May 10 1996 11:46 | 4 |
2475.7 | nec cdr210 & hd on 1540B ? | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Fri May 10 1996 11:56 | 78 |
2475.8 | | HUMANE::soemba.uto.dec.com::RIK | Mostly Harmless | Mon May 13 1996 05:13 | 49 |
2475.9 | .7 solved. on to linux | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Tue May 14 1996 19:16 | 9 |
2475.10 | | TUXEDO::WRAY | John Wray, Distributed Processing Engineering | Wed May 15 1996 08:05 | 16 |
2475.11 | | HUMANE::soemba.uto.dec.com::RIK | Mostly Harmless | Wed May 15 1996 08:46 | 11 |
2475.12 | CD-ROM update? | warbly.reo.dec.com::lzodhcp-182-48-148.lzo.dec.com::hiltong | [email protected] | Wed Apr 30 1997 11:07 | 15 |
| What's the latest feelings regarding CD-ROMS?
I have a 3x speed SCSI, and was wondering if upgrading to a 16x speed
would make any significant difference?
Also should I go the SCSI or EIDE route? I have 2 EIDE controllers on
my mboard, so can put the CD-ROM on the 2nd one. EIDE CD-ROMS seem
cheaper than SCSI.
Also what do you look for in a 16x CD-ROM, what kind of access times
are good/bad/ etc?
Cheers,
greg
|
2475.13 | | NAC::BULEAN::BANKS | Goose Cooker | Wed Apr 30 1997 11:19 | 15 |
| Upgrading to 16x would make a significant difference in your bank balance.
SCSI CD-ROM drives seem to be going at a $100 premium over their ATAPI
counterparts.
Note that not all 16x drives are created equal; some 16x drives are only
16x some of the time.
I've got two drives claiming to be 8x: One reliably transfers at rates that
you'd expect from 8x (like about 1.2MB/sec), the other about what you'd
expect from 4x (like about .6MB/sec).
While the "good" 8x is appreciably faster than the 4x it replaced -- by the
stopwatch -- I don't really see any huge performance improvements
otherwise.
|
2475.14 | Buy $100 EIDE now, wait till DVD in a year or two. | JULIET::HARRIS_MA | Networks Sales Exec | Wed Apr 30 1997 14:21 | 13 |
| SCSI indeed adds $100+ to the cost for the 8x and above drives.
You can get 8x,10x,12x drives for $90-100 in EIDE versions. I think the
16x drives go for just a few bucks more in EIDE.
By the way, there are a number of magazine articales which talk about
raw speed of 'inner-tracks' versus 'outer-tracks'. Outer tracks run at
full 'rated speed' where inner tracks seem to run slower (due to the
varying speed relative to radius from the center).
I'd recommend getting a $100 EIDE 8x,10x,12x,16x for now, and then wait
till DVD prices come down and replace in a year or two.
Mark
|
2475.15 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Wed Apr 30 1997 14:59 | 5 |
| IMHO, upgrading the CD-ROM is one of the cheapest ways to shave the
most seconds off the typical "workload". My current favorite is the
Toshiba 12x TM5702B... it's even faster than some of the "16x" models,
and can be had for about that magic $100 mark.
.02 Kratz
|
2475.16 | | NPSS::NEWTON | Thomas Newton | Wed Apr 30 1997 15:41 | 7 |
|
Re: .15
"workload" or "game load"? ;-)
Most products that actually have to run off the CD-ROM are databases or
games.
|
2475.17 | | PCBUOA::BAYJ | Jim, Portables | Wed Apr 30 1997 17:17 | 4 |
| One man's work is another man's play!
jeb :-)
|
2475.18 | online reviews? | warder.reo.dec.com::rasmodem43.reo.dec.com::hiltong | [email protected] | Thu May 01 1997 06:20 | 5 |
| Are there any Web locations which have reviewed CD-ROM drives? I
imagine you could buy a real poor performer for the same price as a
good performer.
Greg
|
2475.19 | | NAC::BULEAN::BANKS | Goose Cooker | Thu May 01 1997 10:01 | 20 |
| re:.14
The inner vs outer track thing is not true of all CD-ROM drives.
In the beginning, all CD-ROMs varied their speed to give a constant data
rate -- an audio CD player has to do this to make the music play at the
right speed.
The "Constant Angular Velocity" that causes data rates to vary across the
disc is a recent development, and used in some of the cheaper drives. Yah,
some of those will be 16x if you ever get to the edge of the disc, but
since the data starts on the inner track, you'll probably never see the
real 16x unless you're reading the last sectors on a completely full CD.
Which is probably why my one drive that claims to be 8x really reads like
it's 4x, while my other drive that claims to be 8x reads like it's 8x.
Same disc, same files.
Too bad the manufacturers don't have to label this -- it'd be nice to know
what you're really getting.
|
2475.20 | | JHAXP::DECARTERET | Live mice sit on us | Thu May 01 1997 12:16 | 10 |
| I have a Toshiba 6x which is plenty fast, but I have one BIG gripe
about it. It seems to use a gyro to turn the CD at a consistant speed,
but the problem is the gyro spins down after 1 minute of CD inactivity.
While the gyro is spinning the access time to the CD is about 180ms.
When the gyro spins down and I access the drive it takes about 4
seconds to retrieve the data.
Are all high speed CDROMs built like this?
Jason
|
2475.21 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu May 01 1997 12:51 | 4 |
| It's not a "gyro" - all CD drives I've seen spin down after some period of
inactivity.
Steve
|
2475.22 | | PCBUOA::BAYJ | Jim, Portables | Thu May 01 1997 13:44 | 8 |
| You just never knew it until the speeds got so high that they vibrate
the foundations when they spin up.
Laptop drives spin down instantly (within seconds), and so always tend
to have slow access.
jeb
|
2475.23 | | JHAXP::DECARTERET | Live mice sit on us | Thu May 01 1997 16:38 | 9 |
| You know, I kind of feel silly asking that question. It's completely
obvious to me (NOW for some reason) why it WOULD spin down. I'd always
compared it to my blazing fast 2x CDROM at work that responds more or
less as soon as I access it. I'm sure it's because the 2x doesn't have
to spin as fast.
Do some CDROMs spin up (significantly) faster than others?
Jason
|
2475.24 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu May 01 1997 17:28 | 5 |
| I haven't seen any tests of this particular aspect of CD-ROMs. If I had
to guess, I'd say that a more expensive drive like a Plextor is more likely
to come up to speed faster than, say, a Hi-Val.
Steve
|
2475.25 | I couldn't resist this... :-) | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Fri May 02 1997 10:24 | 7 |
| >>I'd say that a more expensive drive like a Plextor is more likely
>>to come up to speed faster than, say, a Hi-Val.
So is a HI-Val cdrom in the same category as say, Value-Jet?
That is that it may have a higher probability to crash? :-)
Bob
|
2475.26 | | LEFTY::CWILLIAMS | CD or not CD, that's the question | Mon May 05 1997 15:40 | 20 |
| The Plextor's tend to use higher quality motors, and never spin down.
BUT- All 12x and under CDROM drives are CLV, which means the CD speed
has to vary as it seeks in or out on the disk... so you always have
some spin up/down delay.
The more expensive drives tend to do this faster. Many of the 8x and
under drives never spin down. It depends on the vendor, quality of the
drive, how the drive is set up, etc.
The ATAPI drives tend to use cheaper parts, and spin down to save the
motor bearings....
At 12X, the disk is spinning at about 6500 RPM on the inner diameter,
which creates quite a vibration problem, and a noise issue. It's
sometimes a relief to have the drive spin down!
YMMV...
Chris
|
2475.27 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon May 05 1997 15:59 | 9 |
| I just bought a Plextor 12X drive, and it spins down after 2 minutes of no
activity, by default. They include a utility which lets you set this delay
to anything you want, including "infinite", but they don't recommend that as
it could lead to overheating.
My previous drive was a 3X, which was the fastest at the time I bought it.
The 12X makes a significant difference.
Steve
|
2475.28 | | PCBUOA::BAYJ | Jim, Portables | Mon May 05 1997 16:25 | 12 |
| Another tidbit on drives...
On the new HiNote VP 500 series, the CD ROM (the new combo drive that
is mated with a floppy disk so you get both, or neither) initially had
some vibration problems. It now comes with a switch located in the
platter where the disk goes, that allows you to select a mode that down
grades the speed of the CD if it detects an imbalance.
What progress! Just like a washing machine!
jeb
|
2475.29 | | AXEL::FOLEY | http://axel.zko.dec.com | Mon May 05 1997 17:15 | 5 |
|
Did anyone else just get a visual of a laptop shaking its way
across a conference room table?
mike
|
2475.30 | On-line reviews? | warins.reo.dec.com::lzodhcp-182-48-148.lzo.dec.com::hiltong | [email protected] | Tue May 06 1997 06:33 | 6 |
| I've a quick 'Altavista' around the Internet, but can't find any
reviews of 16x CD-ROMs.
Anyone have any pointers bookmarked?
Greg
|
2475.31 | Pointer for some review info perhaps useful... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Tue May 06 1997 10:50 | 12 |
| I found a link with some information via Yahoo, and although there
wasn't anything obvious directly related to 16X cdrom drives
there was other useful information in making decisions on
the choice of cdrom drives. It did include some tests done
on 8x and 12X drives. and did include some benchmark charts etc.
You may want to at least bookmark this computer shopper site,
in case they later publish an update report to include 16X
drives.
http://www5.zdnet.com/cshopper/content/9703/cshp0015.html
Bob
|
2475.32 | Thanks! | warins.reo.dec.com::lzodhcp-182-48-148.lzo.dec.com::hiltong | [email protected] | Tue May 06 1997 11:43 | 6 |
| Thanks Bob,
there is a link from that page called Sweet Sixteen, which looks
useful.
Greg
|
2475.33 | SCSI uses less CPU resources? | warins.reo.dec.com::lzodhcp-182-48-148.lzo.dec.com::hiltong | [email protected] | Tue May 06 1997 12:16 | 15 |
| I picked this up off the Internet review:
Another performance factor is the interface. On our tests, although
SCSI drives generally had better average access times than IDE
models, this was not true in all cases. But as a rule, the SCSI
drives used up less of the CPU's resources, thanks to their
bus-mastering host adapters, and therefore performed better on
simultaneous tasks. Still, SCSI adds cost, and since most new
computers use IDE interfaces, most drives continue to support IDE.
If I got an IDE one, I believe my Titan III mboard supports bus
mastering drivers, so would this negate the higher CPU resource
useage of the IDE CD-ROM drives?
Greg
|
2475.34 | that reason is gone too | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Tue May 06 1997 13:53 | 4 |
| The IDE CD-ROMS's can also do DMA fi the controller supports it,
which, for example, brings the Ziff CD-ROM CPU % test down from
97% to SCSI-like 11%.
K
|
2475.35 | | WRKSYS::mccasa.eng.pko.dec.com::DUTTON | There once was a note, pure and easy... | Wed May 07 1997 13:54 | 3 |
| SCSI CD-ROMs are not *always* more expensive...
I picked up at Toshiba 12X at the last KGP show
for a mere $120...
|
2475.36 | | NAC::BULEAN::BANKS | Goose Cooker | Thu May 08 1997 08:34 | 1 |
| Kewl. I'm gonna have to go to a KGP show soon!
|
2475.37 | | WRKSYS::INGRAHAM | Andy | Thu May 08 1997 11:19 | 4 |
| I saw one of those Toshiba 12X SCSI CD-ROMs advertised for a reasonably low
price (~$150?), in some junk mail I got from a PC mail order place. I
think it was about $10 higher than the 16X EIDE CD-ROM drive they listed
(also from Toshiba).
|