| Title: | DEC FUSE - UNIX SDE |
| Notice: | See note #4 for kit locations |
| Moderator: | TLE::TALCOTT |
| Created: | Tue Oct 30 1990 |
| Last Modified: | Fri May 23 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1276 |
| Total number of notes: | 4364 |
Could somebody from the fuse team please reply to this?
For DEC C++ V6.0 namespace support, there two approaches:
a) Mangle namespace members' names the same as class members
b) Mangle namespace members' names in a way that makes it clear the
member is a namespace member, not a class member.
We (the C++ team) would like to go with option (a). Will this break
anything with FUSE (i.e. the class browser)? Is either option
preferred for any reason?
Thanks in advance
- Matt
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1272.1 | I think (a) is what we are expecting. | TLE::ZAREMBA | All things considered, I'd rather hack | Fri Apr 25 1997 14:09 | 7 |
Given member M of Class C in Namespace N we would expect to see N::C::M as the recording name of the member funciton as it appears in the cross reference database. don | |||||
| 1272.2 | Thanks | CXXC::MJHANS | Matthew Hanselman, DEC C/C++ | Mon Apr 28 1997 14:07 | 1 |