| Title: | Current IBM PC conference is NOTED::IBMPC-93 |
| Notice: | Conference write-locked. Continye in NOTED::IBMPC-93 |
| Moderator: | RANGER::BACKSTROM |
| Created: | Wed Mar 05 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jun 15 1993 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 8308 |
| Total number of notes: | 54670 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6314.1 | It is really quite simple 8*) | APACHE::ROBERTS | Steve Roberts DTN: 264-6053 MS: MKO1-2/B06 | Wed Mar 27 1991 13:24 | 16 |
| 6314.2 | WAGON::MAGIK::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:35 | 10 | |
| 6314.3 | why I like flat memory... | TEKVAX::KOPEC | Network partner executed | Wed Mar 27 1991 15:22 | 18 |
| 6314.4 | fresh brains | MADRE::KUGLER | Wed Mar 27 1991 15:23 | 3 | |
| 6314.5 | 20-bits from 16-bits | TROC01::WALDNER | Frank Waldner DTN 637-3433 | Wed Mar 27 1991 16:39 | 11 |
| 6314.6 | use offset <16 | MUDIS3::TKELLERER | Don't Panic | Thu Mar 28 1991 03:42 | 9 |
| 6314.7 | .6 is used by Borland | CECEHV::HOPPENBR_J | I like unproven theories | Thu Mar 28 1991 03:55 | 5 |
| 6314.8 | Segment !@#$%^& registers | SHIPS::GIDDINGS_D | Trailing edge of technology | Thu Mar 28 1991 04:19 | 6 |
| 6314.9 | arrays>64k - why not use HUGE memory model? | IGNATZ::JUDD | Distributed, Queued, Heterogeneous! | Thu Mar 28 1991 20:43 | 1 |
| 6314.10 | HUGE is junk | MARVIN::SCOTT | BArry A. Scott | Thu Mar 28 1991 22:28 | 16 |
| 6314.11 | WAGON::MAGIK::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Fri Mar 29 1991 09:17 | 2 | |
| 6314.12 | BRADOR::HOOPER | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:36 | 11 | ||
| 6314.13 | WAGON::MAGIK::DONHAM | Progress Through Tradition | Tue Apr 02 1991 12:30 | 10 | |
| 6314.14 | Another Memory to Segment question. | DOMO::NEIL | Peter C. | Mon Jan 13 1992 12:31 | 17 |
| 6314.15 | X=A000-C7FF | RANGER::BACKSTROM | bwk,pjp;SwTools;pg2;lines23-24 | Tue Jan 14 1992 12:31 | 0 |
| 6314.16 | Ok, divide by 16 it is. | DOMO::NEIL | Peter C. | Wed Jan 15 1992 11:22 | 4 |