| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1465.1 | Use a DECthreads-aware debugger | WTFN::SCALES | Despair is appropriate and inevitable. | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:06 | 44 |
| 1465.2 | explanations, but not much help... | SMURF::PETERT | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Jan 15 1997 16:44 | 45 |
| 1465.3 | ladebug has its own problems | EDSCLU::GARROD | IBM Interconnect Engineering | Wed Jan 15 1997 17:23 | 19 |
| 1465.4 | | COL01::LINNARTZ | | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:37 | 9 |
| as with the name demangling, you have to call __sleep(N) from within
ladebug. to manipulate threads, I always set an early breakpoint
and call pthread_debug(). This is cause the pthreaddebug.so is
loaded (dlopen, etc), and in case of a problem, this doesnt alwys
work to well. inside pthread_debug() type help to look at the
commands avail.
Pit
|
| 1465.5 | ladebug does not support "hold thread" | PTHRED::HARROW | Jerry Harrow, Resource Broker | Fri Feb 14 1997 08:46 | 8 |
| I just talked to Wanfang about this. I thought they
did as well, but it didn't get implemented. She
recalls hitting some type of problem. She will be
going back to figure out what the issues are.
Would it be possible to add such support in
pthread_debug()?
|
| 1465.6 | See .1... | WTFN::SCALES | Despair is appropriate and inevitable. | Fri Feb 14 1997 10:05 | 8 |
| .5> Would it be possible to add such support in pthread_debug()?
As I indicated in .1, I believe it's already in there. (I'm pretty sure that
it was once; given that, I'm sure we could put it there again, at least for
process contention scope threads.)
Webb
|
| 1465.7 | I misread what you said | PTHRED::HARROW | Jerry Harrow, Resource Broker | Fri Feb 14 1997 10:10 | 10 |
| .1>The best way would be to try using the current version of ladebug instead of
.1>dbx, since it has a built in command to do just that. That said, try
.1>invoking cma_debug() or pthread_debug() from dbx -- I believe that they have
.1>a command (tset? check the "help") which will allow you to "hold" a thread.
When you said "I belive that they have a command", I thought you meant
ladebug, not pthread_debug(). That would have been "I believe that
we have" :-).
-Jer
|
| 1465.8 | Typo... | WTFN::SCALES | Despair is appropriate and inevitable. | Fri Feb 14 1997 10:13 | 7 |
| .1> I believe that they have a command
Whoops. :-) That was a typo... (It should have been "it has", not "they
have".)
Webb
|