T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3610.1 | | UTRTSC::KNOPPERS | Oswald Knoppers | Fri Apr 18 1997 03:34 | 15 |
| > Reason, is some PC client CANNOT handle ip subnet-zero, just before we
> start to look into the problem, can someone IP expert confirm that
> 10.16.0.0 with mask 255.255.240.0 IS or IS NOT 1st subnet in that
> block?
It is:
IP address: 10.16.15.254
Network mask: 255.255.240.0
Broadcast mask: 10.16.15.255
Network number: 10.16.0.0
Regards,
Oswald
|
3610.2 | is 10.16.0.0 is a subnet-zero ? | SNOFS1::63496::CHIUANDREW | | Sun Apr 20 1997 20:51 | 14 |
| re .1,
tnanks,
My questions should be is 10.16.0.0, is it a subnet zero ip subnet?
I think it is not, since 10.0.0.0 is the first subnet (subnet zero)
with mask 255.255.240.0, but 10.16.0.0 is xxxth subnet in 10.0.0.0,
is it correct?
thanks again for any help/idea!
Andrew Chiu - NSIS Sydney
|
3610.3 | | MARVIN::HART | Tony Hart, InterNetworking Prod. Eng. Group | Mon Apr 21 1997 05:11 | 10 |
| > My questions should be is 10.16.0.0, is it a subnet zero ip subnet?
> mask = 255.255.240.0
No, its subnet number 0x100 (256).
10.0.16.0 is subnet number 1
10.0.0.0 is subnet number 0
Tony
|
3610.4 | thanks, that's good news! | SNOFS1::63496::CHIUANDREW | | Mon Apr 21 1997 20:29 | 7 |
| re .3
thanks a lot, customer is complaint that we use IP subnet zero for
their backbone network and thanks again for your clarification.
Andrew Chiu - NSIS Sydney
|