[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference noted::decnis

Title: DEC Network Integration Server (DECNIS)
Notice:Please read note 1 to use this conference effectively
Moderator:MARVIN::WELCH
Created:Wed Sep 18 1991
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3660
Total number of notes:15082

3511.0. "Question about ARP/PING " by TAGEIN::AURAND () Fri Jan 17 1997 07:20

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3511.1MARVIN::PATELTue Jan 21 1997 03:0110
3511.2more questionsTAGEIN::AURANDThu Jan 23 1997 03:5213
3511.3Its intendedMARVIN::HARTTony Hart, InterNetworking Prod. Eng. GroupThu Jan 23 1997 11:5110
3511.4more questionsTAGEIN::AURANDMon Jan 27 1997 04:0420
    Hi Tony,
    
    the real customer configuration is more complex, we used the other one
    just for testing and to understand, what ARP is doing:
    
    -------------------
     |		     |
    Host          DECnis
                   | | |  several more Ethernet and FDDI Interfaces
    
    The host has a default gateway entry for the DECnis. 
    
    We also see the behaviour that you can do a PING to an interface at the 
    DECnis where the Routing Circuit is actually set to OFF.              
    Because the local interface to the host side is still available the DECnis
    still responds to the PING. Is this also the intended behaviour ?
    
    	Many thanks for your help
    
    		Andreas
3511.5MARVIN::HARTTony Hart, InterNetworking Prod. Eng. GroupMon Jan 27 1997 07:2514
>    We also see the behaviour that you can do a PING to an interface at the 
>    DECnis where the Routing Circuit is actually set to OFF.              
>    Because the local interface to the host side is still available the DECnis
>    still responds to the PING. Is this also the intended behaviour ?

	Yes.  Again the idea is that the DECNIS will accept any of its
configured IP addresses as a valid destination address, so even if the circuit
is down you can still telnet and snmp to the router using the same address.

    	It wouldn't be too difficult for us to add a management switch to
change this behaviour to a strict "IP address belongs to a circuit" model.  
Please submit an IPMT case requesting this addition if you need it.

Tony