T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4397.1 | What is the rev of you DECswitch Installation manual? | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Fri May 09 1997 10:26 | 6 |
| My hard-copy of the DECswitch 900EF installation guide dated
May 1995 shows the altitude limit as being 4900m (16,000 ft).
I'm pulling a soft-copy of the D01 rev May 1996 to see what it
says.
Bob
|
4397.2 | Latest version | NETCAD::PERARO | | Fri May 09 1997 11:14 | 9 |
|
The latest manual is on the WEB. It is dated May 1996. This version
now lists the non-operating and operating specifications.
See the manual on the WEB for the numbers.
Mary Peraro
Hardware Doc Project Leader
|
4397.3 | More info...hope this helps clarify things.... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Fri May 09 1997 11:42 | 24 |
| Yup, I've got the May 1996 manual in my hands, and as Mary
alluded to, the rev D01 lists both the operating and non-operating
altitude.
Altitude
- Operating Sea level to 2400 m (8,000 ft)
- Non-operating Sea level to 4900 m (16,000 ft)
For sites above 2400 m (8,000 ft) decrease the
operating temperature specification by 1.8 deg C
for each 1000 m or 3.2 deg F for each 3200 ft.
My recollection of the DEC standard that altitude specs are associated
with is that there has always been an operating and non operating limit.
I suspect that the singular previous altitude limit documented of
4900 m was not a clear and accurate way to document the altitude
limits. Presumably all manuals, as they are updated for other reasons,
will now adhere to the proper procedure of documenting operating and
non-operating limits.
The higher altitude limits are obviously to cover instances where
transportation of the products takes place.
Bob
|
4397.4 | thanks all | BBPBV1::WALLACE | john wallace @ bbp. +44 860 675093 | Fri May 09 1997 14:22 | 9 |
| .-1 is exactly what I expected, and exactly why I was surprised. Owing
to PC trouble I can't confirm the exact rev of the documents I have,
but they are PDF-format manuals which have almost certainly come off
the external web in the last month or 3. They may be from the US or
European pages depending on where and when I got them... I'll be back
with more info when my PC is sorted...
thanks
john
|
4397.5 | | NETCAD::THAYER | ...the hegemony of clarity... | Mon May 12 1997 14:50 | 20 |
|
It's all a bit confusing. There are operating and non-operating
limits. Plus there are various revisions of DEC Standard 102,
the environmental standard. NPB had chosen to stick with the
older, more stingent rev E of the altitude portion of the standard.
The good part is that it doesn't make any difference. I've never
known any of NPB's products to fail any rev of the altitude test.
The DEC Standard 102 web page, tcs.eng.pko.dec.com , notes
that a new rev of the altitude standard will likely be
implmented in the near future. It will be:
Operating Rev G Draft (10,000 Ft)
Non-Operating Rev G Draft (40,000 Ft)
Do remember that the max operating ambient temperature is
decremented as the operating altitude increases.
Tamb Max = 50C - (1.8C/1000m)*(altitude)
|
4397.6 | A test? Theoretical or practical ? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | john wallace @ bbp. +44 860 675093 | Thu May 15 1997 14:57 | 6 |
| When you say "altitude test", do we really stick these things in a
chamber and see how they perform, or is it a careful thermal analysis
taking into account the reduced convection cooling at higher altitudes?
regards
john
|
4397.7 | It's at Parker st. site..... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Thu May 15 1997 15:36 | 5 |
| Yup...there's a chamber at the Parker Street facility in Maynard.
Someone like John Thayer can probably tell you more about it.
He may even have some interesting stories to tell too. :-)
Bob
|