T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4327.1 | Upgrade the image, it's probably not the hardware... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Wed Apr 02 1997 15:02 | 10 |
| I vaguely remember a firmware related problem with that old
rev of firmware that had something to do with those error
codes of 2010 and 202C, and how it may have been related to module
resets occuring. I'm confident that it's not a hardware problem and
I'd reccommend upgrading to a more current of firmware, before
worrying about shipping hardware back.
If it turns out to be the old rev of firmware, the customer has
saved the hassle of having to pack up and ship back the hardware.
Bob
|
4327.2 | | NETCAD::HOPPE | | Wed Apr 02 1997 15:19 | 18 |
| I don't have the map file for V1.4 handy, so I don't know
where the module reset. But, I can tell you that error code
202c is referring to the processor trying to execute an unimplemented
opcode. Error code 2010 is referring to an illegal opcode
error.
Is your module resetting often? Are there any specific conditions
that you are aware of that coincide with the module resetting?
(setting a filter, certain traffic, etc?)
I recommend upgrading to the latest firmware (V1.7.0) and
watching to see if these errors still occur. You probably
have run into a firmware bug in V1.4. I could give you
more information if you obtain a similar error log
with V1.7.0.
Chris
|
4327.3 | Upgrade to latest rev should cure these methinks too... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Wed Apr 02 1997 16:54 | 12 |
| Looking through some old mail, and reading the release notes
associated with the follow-on release v1.5X, I think I've
determined that the error code 2010 was related to an old uart
code routine problem which may have caused the module to reset.
The 202C error code I think was related to an old code problem
where the module would crash if pinged by a 1500 byte packet.
I'm lacking some clarity in the details of both these error codes,
but also feel confortable with saying that upgrading to a current
rev of DECswitch firmware (V1.70) should most likely eliminate
these two error codes from re-occuring.
Bob
|