| Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
| Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
| Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4455 |
| Total number of notes: | 16761 |
Hello,
Some spanning-tree configuration questions.
Configuration:
+-----------+ +------------+
|Gigaswitch | |Gigaswitch |Connected to the
| |----------------| |Giga swichtes are
| |FDDI Hunt group | |3 large BRS clusters
| |4 lines | |
+-----------+STP cost 10 +------------+
STP cost 10| STP cost 10 |
| |
| |
FDDI | FDDI |
| |
| |
STP cost 4 |* STP cost 4 |
+------------+ +------------+
|900EF switch| |900MX switch| Root Bridge
+------------+ +------------+
*|*| |*|*| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |_____________________| | | | |
| | | |_________________________| | | | 5 ethernet segments
| | |_____________________________| | | used for connecting
| |_________________________________| | stations to the
|_____________________________________| network
STP cost Ethernet 10
The lines marked with an * are put into BACKUP.
Questions:
1) Why is the default STP cost for FDDI on a Gigaswitch 10 and the
4 on the DECswitch 900EF/DECbridge 900MX
2) What makes the 900EF in above configuration determine what
ethernet line to put in forwarding because the cost to the root is
equal 10 on all ethernet lines.(24 on FDDI).
Remark: We advised customer to change root to one of the Gigaswitches
and backup root the other gigaswitch.
Regards Gerrit
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3757.1 | NETCAD::ANIL | Wed Jul 31 1996 13:33 | 30 | ||
> 1) Why is the default STP cost for FDDI on a Gigaswitch 10 and the
> 4 on the DECswitch 900EF/DECbridge 900MX
On the 900EF, we wanted a difference between the cost of the Ethernet
and FDDI -- actually wanted the FDDI to be lower -- so that whenever
there's a tie between an FDDI path and an Ethernet path, the FDDI would
be the one that ends up forwarding. This helps ensure that the
highest speed links available get used wherever possible.
> 2) What makes the 900EF in above configuration determine what
> ethernet line to put in forwarding because the cost to the root is
> equal 10 on all ethernet lines.(24 on FDDI).
The tiebreaker goes as follows: Root, Cost, Bridge-ID, Port-ID -- in
that order. Since both bridges have the same Root and Cost, the
Bridge-ID is used to determine which port goes into Forwarding.
The Bridge-ID is an 8-byte quantity: the first two, or most significant,
bytes being the priority of the bridge (which is settable), and the
following 6 bytes being the MAC address of the bridge. (In this case
where there are 7 MAC addresses, it is the MAC address of the
lowest-numbered port, also known as "Node ID" of the bridge,
the one labelled on the box and reported in the console.)
Given that the switch on the right in this picture is the one that
put all its ports into forwarding, it must have a numerically lower
address than the other (assuming you left all spanning tree settings
at their default values).
Regards,
Anil
| |||||