T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3651.1 | | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Mon Jun 24 1996 08:52 | 8 |
|
You are limited to module combinations which have consumption less than
the 90 watts + the other voltages. I've asked and there are no plans to
create higher wattage power supplies. I've run into cases where this
could be useful, but don't have enough cases to justify the development
of a 120W or greater standalone supply.
|
3651.2 | Thankyou | CHEFS::bunnys.reo.dec.com::sheriffj | just one more....... | Mon Jun 24 1996 09:51 | 5 |
| Thanks.......
Regards
Justin Sheriff
|
3651.3 | Another question,,,,, | CHEFS::bunnys.reo.dec.com::sheriffj | just one more....... | Mon Jun 24 1996 10:29 | 10 |
| As an afterthought.......
If the Power arbitration of a DEChub 1-MX is max 90W, and I am 'piggy-backing' two for
redundancy, and a DECswitch 900FO has a max pwr ttl of 53.0W, and a DECswitch 900EF has a max
pwr ttl of 67.5W, does that mean that I cannot power 2 900EF's/900FO's if one of the redundant
pair of docking stations goes down?
Kind regards again...
Justin
|
3651.4 | Reposted for non-windows users | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Mon Jun 24 1996 10:30 | 11 |
| As an afterthought.......
If the Power arbitration of a DEChub 1-MX is max 90W, and I am
'piggy-backing' two for redundancy, and a DECswitch 900FO has a max
pwr ttl of 53.0W, and a DECswitch 900EF has a max pwr ttl of 67.5W,
does that mean that I cannot power 2 900EF's/900FO's if one of the
redundant pair of docking stations goes down?
Kind regards again...
Justin
|
3651.5 | | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Mon Jun 24 1996 10:31 | 3 |
|
Right. Each FO or EF has to have it's own power backup. So, you have to
then do a cost analysis against using a DEChub 900 with N+1 power...
|