| Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
| Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
| Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4455 |
| Total number of notes: | 16761 |
Just when you think you understand...
Ok, dechub 90, decagent 90 (3.0.1) and decserver90m (nas 1.5).
From hubwatch/win 4.1, I can bring up the hub and double-click on the 90m
and everything works, except that the ds90m is NOT in my agent
table.
Why does this work? I'm expecting to get "no mac address specified"
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3479.1 | CSC32::D_PERRIN | Tue Apr 30 1996 15:46 | 9 | ||
Ok, I'll answer my own question. It appears that the server is
being autodiscovered by the agent and then the agent is talking
to it via mop.
I may have shot myself in the foot here too. I found out that
somebody loaded NAS 1.6 field test on the server. (You can't trust
equipment at the CSC to ever be 'normal').
I'm not sure if this behavior is true for NAS 1.5.
| |||||
| 3479.2 | 90m is autodiscoverable | NETCAD::GORDON | Wed May 01 1996 09:20 | 8 | |
Server 90m (4 meg) are autodiscoverable & managable. Maybe your
consusing this server with a server 90tl (1 meg) which must be added
to the denma & hubwatch_agents table. As for nas 1.6. Well, we in
systems test have not been given a pointer to this baselevel and have
not checked it out in any type of hub or even server for that matter.
I'll have to go poking the server folks to see if server testing got
bypassed again.
Tim
| |||||
| 3479.3 | IROCZ::D_NELSON | Dave Nelson LKG1-3/A11 226-5358 | Wed May 01 1996 14:57 | 15 | |
RE: .2 > As for nas 1.6. Well, we in systems test have not been given a pointer > to this baselevel and have not checked it out in any type of hub or even > server for that matter. DNAS V1.6 is currently in External Field Test. You can get a pointer to the Internal Field Test kit from our Remote Access Engineering internal web page: http://www-ra.lkg.dec.com Regards, Dave Nelson | |||||