T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3402.1 | Any reply? | PTOJJD::DANZAK | Pittsburgher � | Wed Apr 10 1996 19:05 | 4 |
| (i'm also waiting with bated breath for a reply to this one...any
takers?)
j
|
3402.2 | Not possible ... | SNOFS1::KHOOJEANNIE | | Mon Apr 15 1996 00:47 | 8 |
| As far as I know, the DS90M is only manageable using its own IP
address, and similarly with the DS90TL.
If it's in a DEChub 900, you would be able to double click on
the DECserver without having to go through the Community Manage Table,
which you have to do with the DEChub 90 or MultiStack.
Jeannie
|
3402.3 | Is This Restriction Documented? | SVCVAX::GAMBARDELLA | Gamby Gumba | Mon Apr 15 1996 09:34 | 8 |
| Re -1 Thanks, I was feeling all alone out here. That's what I thought but
the VAR involved in the sale specifically sold a Decserver 90M to give the
customer the ability to manage the hub from the main window. Is this
restriction documented anywhere or was it omitted from the DR90TS release
notes? I have a feeling the customer/VAR is not going to like this and I
would like to be prepared.
Thanks
|
3402.4 | DNAS V1.6 different? | JULIET::HARRIS_MA | Sales Executive II | Mon Apr 15 1996 13:24 | 5 |
| I think the answer to this question is affected after the DNAS V1.6
code gets released later this year. I think I heard they weer doing
some significant IP Services work in the servers themselves...
Mark
|
3402.5 | DECrepeater 90TS can't manage DECserver 90M | NETCAD::RHODES | | Wed Aug 07 1996 16:35 | 8 |
| Re: .1 and .3
The DECserver 90TS cannot manage the DECserver 90M. It was omitted
from the DECserver 90TS' release notes. As far as manageability, the
DECserver 90M is the same as the DECserver 90TL.
regards,
Ann Marie
|