Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
A question to engineering... Has the flash upgrade problem to the DETMM 900TM repeater been fixed or at least isolated. I have expericed this problem myself - also a customer here has tried upgrading 4 900TM modules from 1.0g/1.0b to 2.0 and 2 of 4 modules failed. The failed modules were 1.0g. I noticed in this notes conference I'm not the only person do a dir/tit=detmm or 900tm and there are heaps of people who are experincing simlar problems. Unfortunately there are not many notes back telling us how to fix the problem. So please guys, lets get this sorted out. Customers here on site are saying buy 3COM - you don't have to assign an IP address for every module and you can upgrade them safely. It's a bit hard to defend Digital when you have no information to back you up. Thanks in advance - Shaun
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3379.1 | I had a problem as well | KAOFS::R_YURKIW | reward those who bring bad news!! | Wed Mar 20 1996 09:00 | 18 |
Just my 2 cents of experience on the DETMM problems. I just did an upgrade last night to a DETMM repeater running 1.0g code to 2.0 code. The TFTP server donwloaded the coad but when the module came time to reset all the leds on the module lit up and stayed on. The polling on the HUBloader screen just kept timing out every 15 seconds. After waiting a reasonable amount of time (more than 10 minutes) I decided that the only thing I could do was power cycle it. I did this and the module rebooted ok and was running the V2.0 code. I really thought I had killed the module and breathed a sigh of relief when it came back (after hours upgrades when you are two hours from the nearest office are a real bugger). regards Roger | |||||
3379.2 | BOOTP | JULIET::HARRIS_MA | Sales Executive II | Thu Mar 21 1996 01:27 | 14 |
I was one of the original folks that found this problem, and I know that engineering *WAS* able to re-create it... but no fix was ever discussed. Problem was not tracked down. The only suggestion was to take the 'brain dead' module and power-cycle it. After a moment, it will send out a BOOTP request for "DETMM" to which ANY BOOTP server should be able to send it the image for DETMM200.BIN. (I never got this working, but this was the suggestion from LKG.) I simply had field service swap the module. Mark | |||||
3379.3 | me too | GIDDAY::MORAN | Thu Mar 21 1996 02:01 | 36 | |
I tried to bring back to life my two dead modules as well and I could'nt get the Bootp side to work. Configuration was: tftp server configured to give the 900TM module an IP address and then I configured the TFTP server to serve of DETMM200.bin to anyone asking for DETMM. I then set up IRIS on another PC to watch what was happening. I could see the Bootp requests from the 900Tm but no response back from the hubloader PC. I tried another PC which has hubloader installed but still no luck. Both of these machines run fine doing firmware upgrade in the past (except for 900TM's :-) My only thought is that it's related to the fact that there is two different version of hubloader out there - one with the hubwatch kit and one with the netrider kit. Of course being able to bring a module back from the brink of death would be nice but does'nt stop the original problem of 1.0g modules not upgrading properly. The customer I am dealing with have there hubs in REMOTE sites connected via a large WAN network. We were planning do do the firmware upgrades over the LAN but with the possibility of the 900TM dying it's too big a chance to take. Hopefully some focus will be put on this and if I'm real lucky maybe someone from engineer will reply to this note. Come on, were not that bad a bunch to talk to are we ???? Shaun | |||||
3379.4 | Possible workaround | GIDDAY::MORETTI | Death is just a formality | Thu Apr 11 1996 21:11 | 34 |
Shaun, I have tried to get the braindead repeaters back on-line using a "real" computer (read alpha running unix) running as a tftp server and although I found the BOOTP request from the repeater and the subsequent response from the server to the repeater I never saw a TFTP request from the repeater. All that happened was that the repeater kept sending BOOTP requests. I have found thru testing of live V1.0g modules that if they are upgraded to V1.1 first and then to V2.0 then all is well. I proceeded to site to try this method in a critical hub900 and found this additional step to resolve the killing of 900TM modules. This was carried out while attached to the HUB900 being upgraded and will now be tested over the WAN link by the customer using the DETMM110.BIN file I got off the 'net. Prior to doing this step the customer upgraded 10 modules at one site and got 3 braindead modules which all happened to be V1.0g so it was with some trepidation that they attempted the same thing with 8 repeaters at another site, 5 of which were V1.0g . We upgraded according to the additional V1.1 step and all modules upgraded with no problems. I put this forward as a possible workaround to cut down the number of spares we are using in this upgrade process. John Moretti RSSG Brisbane | |||||
3379.5 | Thanks, | JULIET::HARRIS_MA | Sales Executive II | Fri Apr 12 1996 14:41 | 11 |
re: -.1 Thanks a million... I think engineering would love to hear this. Many of us have had this bug bite us, but no one was able to track it down as thouroughly as you did. (Did you forward to some of the folks in LKG?) Thanks, Mark | |||||
3379.6 | 900TM upgrade workaround | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Tue Apr 23 1996 14:10 | 10 | |
Hi John - I have been keeping an eye on this problem and am pleased to hear about upgrading to v1.1 prior to going to v2.0. Thanks for your help. Frank. [Posted by WWW Notes gateway] | |||||
3379.7 | Hubloader and Netrider Loader Problem! | ZUR01::ACKERMANN | Thu Apr 25 1996 10:14 | 68 | |
Hello all, I think, there are two Bugs in the upgrade Process of the DETMM: Situation: ---------- I had the same Problem at a big Customer Site, during the upgrade of the DETMM from Versions V1.0F (Manufactory Version ?) and Versions V1.0G to Version V2.0.0 The Customer produced about 4 braindead Moduls out of 10 Modules. So he sent me 2 of these Modules to "repair" them. (the others went already to the Repair Center) Problem 1 (or Bug): ------------------- I put it in to our Test HUB, connected the MGNT Station direct on one of the 32 Ports. (PC, Windows, Hubwatch 4.1.2) The Netrider Loader has the Version:1.0-03 I made the following Entry in the Netrider Loader: In Config: -Servers: -the Ethernet Address and the IP Address -Files: -the Request File Name: DETMM -the Local File Name: DETMM200.BIN (Read Access) Then i setup IRIS and we could see the Bootp requests. Also in the Netrider Loader Window, we could see, how the Counter for BOOTP goes up, but it never starts to load with the TFTP Server! So, i think, it is not possible to load a braindead DETMM with the Netrider Loader supplied with Hubwatch! Workaround: I setup in UCX BOOTP and a TFTP Server and it just ---------- works fine. Its incredible fast, as soon as you have finished to set it up, the braindead Module is loaded and running again! Problem 2 (or Bug) ----------------- I asked the Customer about the Version of the Hubloader, he told me that he is using Version V1.0.0 I checked and found out, that these Version is supplied with Hubwatch V4.0 In our Equipment we are using Hubwatch Version V4.1.2 with Hubloader V1.1.0 Now i downgraded the same Module in our Hub to Version V1.0G with Hubloader and made the Upgrade direct to Version V2.0.0 without any Problems! Even i made it several Times, but never had any Problems! Now i really tried to shut the Module braindead: In several stages of the download Process i took the Module out of the Hub, but it n e v e r got braindead. If I pulled to early, than it kept the old Version, and any stage later, it had already the New Image loaded! So for me, i think these must be a Bug of the Hubloader Version V1.0.0! The Entry 3379.4 seems to be the Workaround for Hubloader Version V1.0.0? Any Comments to these 2 Problems are verry appreciated, Thanks, Daniel MCS Switzerland |