[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
|
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
3304.0. "non DEC RJ45 logging high counters" by CSC32::D_HIGHLAND () Thu Feb 22 1996 18:16
Has anyone seen high counts of LEM, LCT, connects completed, and ring
inits on a 900MX UTP mod pmd port with third party cables? Mainly the
connector head itself.
What we've found is a slight difference in connector length, but it
appears to be making a real difference in the connection, or lack of
in this case.
At this point it is only speculative, however, we've seen it one other
time, as soon as the DEC cable was used, the above mentioned counters
quieted.
File access and copies are failing, the port LEDs go from Green to
Amber...then back to green after a couple of minutes. We've tried
other ports, other MX's, other controllers, and OS (OpenVMS and WNT).
We have tried other cables but all have been made outside DEC.
Since the configuration is valid, and the versions are all current
(except the MX is running V3.1.1 ...I think the latest there is
V3.2.x). We've asked the customer to try one of our cables. (big
sale!)
Has anyone seen similar symptoms with non-DEC cables?
Dave Highland
CSC/CS
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3304.1 | RE: El-cheapo cables .... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Fri Feb 23 1996 09:00 | 9 |
| Dave you might want to try posting this question in the FDDI
notes conference UPSAR::FDDI. For those who might see your post
here, it might help if you can be specific about the vendors
who make the cables in question. That way our engineering folks
responsible for our FDDI cables can get some of these and possibly
analyze them. You may also want to include this additional info (vendors)
in your post in the FDDI notes file too.
Bob
|
3304.2 | do they have the correct cable? | NETCAD::MELARAGNI | | Fri Feb 23 1996 14:15 | 15 |
| Are you sure that the non-DEC cables are actually Cat 5 behind-the-wall
cables?
There are two kinds of Cat 5 cable -- "behind-the-wall" and "patch cord".
"Behind-the-wall" cable is designed to meet the EIA/TIA-568 specs for
cable loss for lenghts up to 90m. Patch cord has a much higher loss and as
such is limited to 10m total length. If your customer is using patch
cord of lengths greater than 10m, then this might be the problem.
You can usually tell patch cord from the behind-the-wall cable by the
flexible nature of the patch cord. The behind-the-wall cable is usually
stiff.
bill
|
3304.3 | It's patch cord and may exceed 10m | CSC32::D_HIGHLAND | | Fri Feb 23 1996 18:15 | 14 |
| He is connected to his Alpha's PCI UTP controller (DEFPA) directly from
the 900MX MOD PMD UTP port. No "behind-the-wall." This is the reason
he went to the third party make. Digital's solution (I don't have the
part number) for this cable was only 3 meters. He needed at least 6
meters, however, it may actually be longer, I'll have to check.
Our 3 meter cable appears to be for wall connections only.
I will cross post this in FDDI as well.
Thanks for the information.
Dave
|