[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference netcad::hub_mgnt

Title:DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE
Notice:Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7
Moderator:NETCAD::COLELLADT
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4455
Total number of notes:16761

3017.0. "OVERSIZE FRAME error on FDDI ports?" by MSDOA::REED (John Reed @CBO = Network Services) Tue Nov 28 1995 22:18

    Hello..
    
    I have a customer with two DECswitch 900EF, two DECbridge 900MX, one
    PEswitch 900TX, and three DECNIS w/FDDI cards on a ring.
    
    This is the entire ring, and all of the HUB modules are at the latest
    v1.5.2 firmware.  I am seeing OVERSIZE frame errors on the FDDI at a
    rate of two per second continually.  I have systemattically removed
    each node from the ring, one at a time, but the bad frames persist.  
    I enabled the ring purger, but no effect.  My traffic rate is ususally
    above 40% (according to the HUBwatch counters.  I see this frame error
    incrementing all all Bridges EXCEPT one, which sees NO ERRORS.  I
    figured he was the bad guy, and pulled him out of the hub, but the
    other nodes kept seeing OVERSIZE FRAMES about one per second.
    
    Any ideas?
    
    JR
      
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3017.1How about an un-educated guess???MSDOA::REEDJohn Reed @CBO = Network ServicesWed Dec 06 1995 22:1818
    Hello ?
    
    I just went back to this site, and looked at the FDDI counters again. 
    The customer has asksed me if I have any data about this counter.  I
    told him that I was still looking into it's meaning.
    
    I have looked at the four DECbridge 900MX, and one PEswitch900TX, and
    they are seeing the OVERSIZE frames in their  FDDI port counter
    display.  There are only three other nodes (DECNIS 600's) on the ring,
    and none of these have any errors.  Specifically they have a counter
    called "FDDI Station x link y PDU Length counter" which is NOT incrementing.
    
    Is this incrementing counter a feature of v1.5.2?   I have enabled RING
    purger on the four bridges, and that didnt' get rid of them.  There are
    no ENDNODES on the FDDI.  So I am really confused.
    
    
    
3017.2How about just a counter sample?MSDOA::REEDJohn Reed @CBO = Network ServicesMon Dec 18 1995 09:1621
    I just received another call from this customer, who wants to know if
    this counter increments on everyone's network at this pace, or if
    something at this site is strange.
    
    Could someone out there who has a DECswitch 900EF on an FDDI, please
    run HUBwatch, and look into the FDDI Counters window, and tell me if
    the OVERSIZE FRAMES count is incrementing every second, or staying at
    0.
    
    
    I don't need a scientific survey, but just some real data about whether
    this number is only crazy at MY site, to let me know if I need to be 
    worried about this counter.   Each of the Switch modules se the error,
    except the module that was two or three years old...  All are at
    v1.5.2, and NONE of the DECNIS routers (who are the only other three
    nodes on the FDDI) have logged any FDDI errors (oversize or otherwise).
    
    Does anyone else see this counter ?
    
    JR
    
3017.3NETCAD::DOODYMichael DoodyMon Dec 18 1995 11:005
    I looked at a couple DECbridge 900MX and did not see the OVERSIZE
    incrementing. (They all had the value 12 interestingly, this is after 
    months on uptime.) I dunno what it means.
    
    md 
3017.4Not the Cables either...MSDOA::REEDJohn Reed @CBO = Network ServicesMon Dec 18 1995 11:437
    Wow.   Ok.  I must have a problem then.  ;^(    Mine have been 
    incrementing constantly every second two or three packets, since the 
    installation Thanksgiving weekend.   (big numbers by now...)
    
    Gotta grab a FDDI analyzer.
    
    JR
3017.5Got my sniffer. Now I'm confused...MSDOA::REEDJohn Reed @CBO = Network ServicesFri Jan 12 1996 00:4727
    Well, 
    
    I just got home from the site, I ordered a Network General FDDI
    Analyzer and took it to the site.  I monitored between a HUB900's
    DECswitch 900EF, and a DECNIS.   While the HUBwatch counter for that
    switch continually incremented it's oversize frame counter, I watched
    the packet SIZE indicator on the sniffer, and the oversize frame error
    indicator.
    
    The NG sniffer did not see a single oversize frame.  In fact, the
    largest frames it saw were 1500 bytes.  It did see some frames less
    than 40 bytes, which confused me.    
    
    I also was very confused by the traffic level.  The HUBWatch traffic
    indicator on all five of the DECswitch modules shows an FDDI traffic
    level jumping between 20% to 55%.     I was really amazed to see that
    the NG saw a level of only 3%.  Why is the HUBwatch traffic meter ten
    times higher than the sniffer?
    
    What does the HUBwatch traffic indicator mean?  Percent of module
    utilization?  Amount of memory use on the switch?   It certainly did
    not correspond to the NG readings.  
    
    What should I do with these oversize frame counters that the customer
    is now annoyed about.  They don't increment on the three DECNIS, or my
    NG sniffer.  Only the DECswitch modules, and only the four newer ones.
    
3017.6STRWRS::KOCH_PIt never hurts to ask...Fri Jan 12 1996 09:114
    
    If you search this file, you'll find a note about the FDDI counters.
    They don't work right now. Maybe the oversize counter has the same
    problems.
3017.7Same problem hereGIDDAY::KINGSMILLGeoff Kingsmill, AustraliaFri May 10 1996 02:484
I'm also seeing the oversized frame errors and believe its a firware bug?
Has this been confirmed? Is there a fix available?

Geoff..