T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2665.1 | | NETCAD::DRAGON | | Wed Aug 23 1995 10:55 | 14 |
|
Jeannie,
The DECrepeater 90TS will be able to manage other DECrepeater 90TS
and DECrepeater 90FS modules as a proxy agent. This means that
they will not have to have an IP address of their own. However, the
DECrepeater 90TS or DECrepeater 90FS as a proxy agent will not
provide full MIB support. In order to get full MIB support of the
module, it will have to have its own IP address and be managed
direct. Features which will not be available via proxy are security,
dual port redundancy, and performance (speedo dials).
Regards,
Bob
|
2665.2 | only a repeater manager | PRSSOS::PEYRACHE | Jean-Yves Peyrache Country Support Group France | Wed Aug 23 1995 13:34 | 6 |
|
Be careful.
as far as known, 90TS/FS can't manage DECbridge90
JYP
|
2665.3 | Another 90TS Mgt. query | BRIEIS::BARKER_E | Eighteen days and counting ... | Thu Aug 24 1995 04:51 | 22 |
| Hi,
I've got a similar query. We have three DEChub 90's, one has a
DECagent 90, set up to manage the other hubs. One of the other hubs
has a DECbridge 90FL to act as the bus master, in slot 8, a DECserver
90M in slot 7 and a DECrepeater 90TS in slot 6. The DECrepeater 90TS
can be managed standalone via it's own IP address with no problems but
when the DEChub 90 community that it's in is selected via the DECagent
I get a blank module in slot 6 that says DECrepeater 90TS with no more
details, and I can't manage it. The Message log shows slot 6 with a
question mark. I have made sure the MAC address of the DECrepeater 90TS
is entered in the hw_agent.dat file.
The hub that has the DECagent in has also got DECrepeater 90TS's
and they can be managed perfectly OK. Is this situation a reflection
of the general recommendations now being made to put a DECagent in most
hub 90's ?
Any ideas ?
Euan
|
2665.4 | New | SWAM2::JACOMB_SC | I know enough to be dangerous!! | Mon Aug 28 1995 19:01 | 3 |
| Have you looked at the stackables?
-Scott
|
2665.5 | Several Choices | NETCAD::DRAGON | | Tue Aug 29 1995 09:50 | 26 |
| RE:3
Euan,
It is my understanding that DECrepeater 90TS and 90FS in a remote
DEChub 90 (with DECbridge 90/90FL being managed by a remote DENMA)
are only manageable by HUBwatch directly via their own IP address.
When a DECrepeater 90TS and 90FS is present in a non-remote DEChub
90 (DEChub 90 with DENMA present), HUBwatch actually manages the
module directly, using IP address information provided by the
DENMA. This mechanism does not work in the remote DEChub 90s, so
that it is necessary for the user to manually provide the repeater's
IP address to HUBwatch rather than a point and click on the DEChub 90
Front Panel Window. Clearly this is not the most desireable behavior.
To correct this the user could add a DENMA to the remote DEChub 90,
But, this will use up a slot and costs more money.
As was pointed out in .4, the stackables may offer a solution to
the remote hub problem in some cases in that a repeater which can
manage the "previously remote hub" may be added rather than a DENMA,
thus not using up a slot and being per port cheaper.
Bob
|