T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2484.1 | You connect concentrators, not ports! | MXOC00::CSILVA | | Fri Jul 07 1995 13:15 | 16 |
|
About 2)
The idea behind the LIGO types in HW, it's to provide a set of valid
configurations, each one representing one of the possible combinations
for front panel ports 1 and 6 and backplane connections.
So, each LIGO type represents the whole concentrator, when you take
the stub in HW, you are connecting the one or two ports connecting to
the backplane depending on the selection made.
Since "the concentrator is the building block for FDDI networks",
in HW you make conections among concentrators, not ports.
|
2484.2 | No problem | MXOC00::CSILVA | | Fri Jul 07 1995 13:28 | 9 |
|
And for 1) there will be no problem, but if prefer,
you can configure that port as port M
Carlos Silva
Digital Mexico
|
2484.3 | another way to say what Carlos did | NETCAD::DOODY | Michael Doody | Fri Jul 07 1995 15:37 | 10 |
|
The "FDDI backplane lan" doesn't equate to A or B or M or S.
All connections are point to point - if you have an A out the back
then it is forced by the LIGO's in Hubwatch to connect to a
B port on a neighbor module. The FDDI backplane lans are either
rings or trees - not a mix.
Read note #2340 for more info.
-Mike
|
2484.4 | some more... | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Fri Jul 07 1995 16:29 | 30 |
| re: .2
> And for 1) there will be no problem, but if prefer,
> you can configure that port as port M
really? I can find nothing to indicate that the front panel
FDDI ports on a DECbridge 900MX can be anything but A and B...
I assumed that if A+B were configured to the backplane that the
front panel ports would be inactive..........
here's what I'm trying to do:
I have a 900 hub with a number of DC900MXs and one DB900MX...all
the DC900MXs are currently configured with A+B as backplane ports
and the S port of systems with SAS adapters connected to the front
panel M ports...the DB900MX is currently configured with A+B
as backplane ports and one 10BT port on the front panel connects the
hub to the rest of the network...all modules in the hub are connected
to an FDDI backplane LAN segment, and I now gather that this
is essential a virtual dual ring...
- is this configuration correct so far?
- is there a better/other way to configure it? for
example as a virtual single ring? advantages/disadvantages??
can I now connect another SAS adapter's S port to anything on the
front panel of the DB900MX? if not, would some other configuration
allow me to do so???
_kelley
|
2484.5 | | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Fri Jul 07 1995 16:33 | 5 |
| I posted .4 will and then saw .3...I will read the doc and
see if it answers my questions...
thanx
_kelley
|
2484.6 | a (hopefully) clearer question | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Fri Jul 07 1995 19:17 | 36 |
| ok, the doc pointer in .3 was very helpful...I can now talk
I hope more intelligently about this...
first, its clear to me I need to install wave 3 firmware...that's
why I haven't seen the option to make the external ports on
the DS900EF (yes: I now know I should no longer be calling this
a DB900MX ;-) a PHY M....so I'll get off my butt and install the
stuff in the DEChub CFW V4.0 kit, and get HUBwatch V4 et. al....
with that in mind, is the following a legal FDDI tree config?
Front Panel Ports
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-----------+-+
| DC900MX | | DC900MX | | DC900MX | | DS900EF |
+-+---------+-+ +-+---------+-+ +-+---------+-+ +-+-----------+
| | | | | | |
| + + + + + +
S M------S M------S M------S
Backplane Ports
in all cases, front panel PHY M ports will be connected to PHY S
ports of SAS adapters in Alphas...
if this is legal, is there anything special I need to do either
in ordering the modules in the DEChub slots or in ordering how
I drag the backplane ports to the backplane LAN interconnect, or
does HUBwatch and/or the hub itself figure out which port should
be used to connect to its neighbor?
thanx for the help so far...
_kelley
|
2484.7 | | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | | Sat Jul 08 1995 21:37 | 5 |
|
Yes, this is legal. You can place the modules anywhere you want in the
hub. You then create the FDDI LAN with Hubwatch, configure the LIGOs,
and pull them down to the FDDI LAN ICON. The MAM will connect them in
the backplane as described in note 2340.
|
2484.8 | :-) | KLUSTR::GARDNER | The secret word is Mudshark. | Mon Jul 10 1995 12:20 | 3 |
| thanx for all the help
_kelley
|
2484.9 | But remember... | MXOC00::CSILVA | | Mon Jul 10 1995 18:39 | 36 |
| I see you are very concerned about the placement of
modules and details like that, just a recomendation about
the order of connections of modules:
When you connect modules in HW remember to connect first
adjacent modules.
The structure of the backplane channels is like this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (structure of modules)
---------------
---------------
---------------
--------------- (10 flex channels covering all slots)
---------------
---------------
---------------
---------------
------- ------- (4 flex channels covering a half of all
slots)
------- -------
If you connect something like 4 DC900MX in slots 1, 3, 5 & 7 and
connect
first 1 and 7, you are using 1 of the 10 "complete flex channels".
But if you connect 1 to 3 instead, you are using one of the split
channels
at the bottom, reserving the "complete" channels for other actual or
future uses.
Conclution: First connect the adjacent modules to take advantage of the
split channels in the backple.
"Adjacent" meaning "in the same group of 4 slots sharing a split
channel"
|
2484.10 | | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | | Mon Jul 10 1995 19:21 | 8 |
|
re .9
Actually, the order of connection is not something you need to
keep track of. Hubwatch will allocate the channels in the optimum
mmanner so that you (the user) do not have to worry about all of this.
You are correct about the types of things that are at issue, but
they are hidden from the users.
|