[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
|
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
2479.0. "DECswitch is hanging" by BERFS4::NORD () Thu Jul 06 1995 09:53
Hello you,
out there in the world of magic:
***************is crossposted to UPSAR::FDDI and KALI::HUB_MGMT*****************
- four DECswitches 900 MX
- connected all together to a fantastic FDDI-ring with fiber-optic
- among these bridges a DECconcentrator 900, with A- and B-port
connected to this FDDI-ring with fiber-optic, port 2 till 5 have
TP-PMDs, which are connected to Windows NT-Servers and one SCO-Unix-
Server
before you ask:
- all DECswitch 900 MX have their own docking-station
- the DECconcentrator has it's own docking-station
- for the DECswitch 900, all have the same:
+ HW: V1/2
+ RO: V0.4
+ Firmware: V1.5.0 (was V1.4.4 befor, done an upgrade)
- managed all this with Hubwatch V4.0.1
- all these systems, talked above, have their own IP-address for mana-
gement with Hubwatch.
Now the problem:
My client is connected to the segment on port 2 of the switch.
I start a backup from my PC, running Windows NT, to one of the servers,
connected to the concentrator.
All is well, for me.
I get a connection to the server and do my backup.
In the meantime, the connections of all other clients, which are con-
nected to the same switch as my client, but on the other Ethernet-
ports, are dropped, independently whether the connection is local (same
segment) or between the segments on the same switch. The connections
are closed, the only one connection, which was not dropped, is the one,
that I own. It is not possible, to bring up a new connection, neither
in the same segment to another client nor to another segment on the
same switch. The onliest thing I can do, is a ping to one of the server.
I haven't checked whether I'm able to ping a client, connected to a
segment on another switch.
To analyze this problem I connected a Wandel and Goltermann DA-30 to
the FDDI-ring. At first I do a "RING MAP" and saw all the systems,
connected to the FDDI-ring as DAS or SAS (servers). I start my backup.
Some times later, the downstream neighbour of the bridge, to which my
client is connected to, declares, the upstream neighbour address is
lost and it is unable to get it back (seen on the DA-30 screen). With
Hubwatch, I get a "agent is not responding". With our LAN-analyzer IRIS,
connected to another segment of this bridge, I can only see the local
traffic on this segment, and the MOP-sysid-broadcast of all the bridges
in this ring and the connected servers on the concentrator. The local
traffic is only NETBIOS-broadcast. On the DA-30 I see NIF request from
my downstream neighbour, but my bridge don't answer to this request.
I have checked this problem on all the installed bridges, all bridges
have the same symptom. After my connection is released (my backup is
done) I have to reset these bridge to make new connections possible.
This scenario is seen at customer side since this FDDI-ring is estab-
lished, which was done three weeks ago. And this scenario can also be
seen, if someone at customer side is doing large database requests.
With this problem, the customer is asking us, whether we are able to
fix this problem in the next time, or we have to deinstall our equip-
ment and he will buy briges and concentrator of another vendor.
Do you have ever seen such a problem???
Thanks for replies
Wolfgang Nord @BEO at Germany
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2479.1 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Thu Jul 06 1995 12:43 | 12 |
| During the time that the backup procedure is causing this problem could
you check the size of the forwarding database on the DECswitch? Is the
size of the fwdb consistent with the number of known addresses on the
customer's net? Are any of the NT systems directly connected to the FDDI?
I suggest that you escalate this problem by opening an IPMT case against
the DEFBA so that we can track it within engineering.
Bill Wade
Network Product Support
|
2479.2 | answer one, thanks | BERFS4::NORD | | Thu Jul 06 1995 14:10 | 32 |
|
Hello Bill,
I have had a small problem to connect to the bridge at the time it is
only realising the connection between my NT-client and the server con-
nected to the DECconcentrator, I think I've mentioned in my request.
I'm unable to connect to the bridge, I'm connected on with my NT-
client, since Hubwatch reports a "...Agent is not responding..." or so,
it's the onliest answer from my Hubwatch-window. And I'm not connected
to the same bridge, the same segment as my NT-client is. All the seg-
ments and all the bridges, I'm connected to, are different.
So I can't give you the answer, you espected.
There are two NT-systems directly connected to the FDDI-ring, using
the DECconcentrator, and one SCO-UNIX-system, likewise connected to
the DECconcentrator, all these systems are server for the NT-clients.
All the NT-clients and SCO-clients, connected to the FDDI-ring, are
using the DECswitch 900 Ethernet interface, no direct connection.
Bill, can you explain, how to "...open a IPMT..." 'cause I haven't
done it befor, I've never had such a problem.
Thanks from the so called "Wrapped Reichstag" in Berlin
Wolfgang Nord
at Berlin at Germany
|
2479.3 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Fri Jul 07 1995 15:56 | 5 |
| This discussion is continuing offline.
Bill
|