| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2450.1 | | SLINK::HOOD | Maine State Bird: The black fly | Fri Jun 30 1995 12:04 | 4 |
| No. You can do that with the workstation versions, but not with the
PC version.
Tom Hood
|
| 2450.2 | Why not? | PTOJJD::DANZAK | Pittsburgher � | Thu Jul 06 1995 09:37 | 4 |
| Just curious...any reason why not? i.e. customers who want multi-hub
displays up on critical areas find it nice.
j
|
| 2450.3 | How? | SLINK::HOOD | Maine State Bird: The black fly | Thu Jul 06 1995 15:42 | 5 |
| Is this something that should be included in every HUBwatch for Windows?
Or should there be a HUBwatch for Windows, Multiscreen? Are a lot of
people unhappy with the current product, or is it just a few big users?
t
|
| 2450.4 | Some input from Calgary | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Thu Jul 06 1995 17:44 | 18 |
| I think multi-screen capability would add a level of usefulness to HW
for Windows that just might make it more saleable. Being able to look
at and compare two configurations at the same time would be exceedingly
useful in trouble shooting networks. As it is, because of its *very*
limited scope, we are very often "forced" throw it into network deals we
do. It has been considered by customers to be a weak point in the whole
DEChub strategy.
Just my $.02 worth...
Brian Pituley
NPC, Calgary
PS: Yes, I am aware it is designed as a hub manager as opposed to a
network manager but customers balk at having to run two management
applications in order to get full control of their networks.
|