Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
We have a DEChub 90 with a DEcrepeater 90FL connected to four remote DECbridge 90FLs in 4 remote DEChub 90s. We used to get about 100 or so Framing errors on all the remote DECbridge 90FLs everyday. The counts as seen by connecting to the DECbridge 90FL using NCP where EXACTLY the same on all 4 DECbridge 90FLs Fibre ports. The Framing errors in terms of the percentage of received frames is less than 0.1 percent, yet the customer wants this fixed because he has 10 other sites of similar configurations with zero Framing Errors on the remote DECbrisge 90 FLs. We don't have Hubwatch to see the DECrepeater 90FLs ports' counters. We changed the DECrepeater 90FL as a logical approach to resolving the problem. The spare DECrepeater 90FL was worse than the original. The percentage of Framing errors on all the 4 DECbridge 90FLs now jumped to nearly 50% of the received frames. The problem DEChub90 (that holds the problem DECrepeater 90FL) also has a DECbrouter 90 (DEWBR), whose Ethernet Port is clean - no errors. This makes us believe the DEChub90 backplane and power supply should be good. Is there any issue with DECrepeater 90FLs or is it that we just got two bad ones - one very bad compared to the other ? We have ordered another spare DECrepeater 90FL. The fibres have been TDRed and all look good. Alphonse
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2304.1 | Firmware ? | ZPOVC::TIMA_INDO | Wed Jun 07 1995 05:31 | 9 | |
Hi... How is the firmware version on the 4 bad DB90FL compare to 10 good one? rgd farozi NIS | |||||
2304.2 | DB90 are all at ver 3.9 | GIDDAY::STANISLAUS | Wed Aug 23 1995 23:53 | 4 | |
DB90 are all at ver 3.9 Alphonse |