[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
|
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
2090.0. "HUB90/DB90 config question" by ODIXIE::RICHARDSON (Are we there yet??) Fri Mar 10 1995 08:22
<<< UPSAR::USER$411:[NOTES$LIBRARY]ETHERNET.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Ethernet Volume 3 >-
================================================================================
Note 640.0 DECHUB/DB90 config question No replies
ODIXIE::RICHARDSON "Are we there yet??" 71 lines 9-MAR-1995 15:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was out at a customer site today and they were having "intermittent"
(i.e. unreproducable) errors (performance problems) on their network. It
looks like the following:
Location 1 Location 3
HUB_____FREP___fiber___FREP__
|
Location 2 | |---thinwire repeater
| __v____________________
HUB_____FREP___fiber___FREP__|__|_ |
_____|_ | Cabletron HUB
| | |
| __|_ |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |__|___________________
| |_______Goes to another Cabletron HUB
___*__|_____ with a bunch (300) of PC's
| |
Desta Desta
| |
Prism SONET
bridge
|
single mode
fiber
|
Prism SONET
bridge
| |
Desta Desta Location 4
|___*_______|
|
|--3com bridge
|
| |---DR90C
| __v____________________
|__|_ | | |
_____|_ | | <|--DECbridge 90
| | | | |
Alpha________ | | | DECHUB | _|___H4005__thkwire
6410 | | | |
Networked fax | | | |
|__|_______________|__|
Sniffers are located at *
The sniffer in location 4 is showing a LOT (about 1 every 1-2 seconds) of
CRC errors. However, it is also not showing any packet losses or
retransmits. the sniffer in location 3 is not showing any errors. The
exact error being logged is "JUNGLEMUX BRIDGE PROBE FRAME TO CLEAR LAN
ERROR. BAD CRC IS INTENTIONAL" The Junglemux bridge is the Prism SONET
bridge. This doesn't look to be an issue to me but they are wondering why
the errors are being logged. (I recommended them calling Prism).
The PC's in location 1, however are "reportedly" running slowly. They
don't look to be violating any repeater rules, but there is an awful lot
of "stuff" off the repeater in location 4. Could this be a problem?
Would it be better to put the thinwire segment coming from the SONET
bridge in location 4 directly onto the thickwire? As it is, that's an
awful large "workgroup" off that hub (about 400 PC's and 5 Servers).
Is there a better way to do this? As it is, it is working, but it looks
rather shaky to me.
thanks
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|