T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1841.1 | | NETCAD::SLAWRENCE | | Wed Jan 04 1995 16:53 | 3 |
|
Why turn off spanning tree? It costs almost nothing.
|
1841.2 | | NETCAD::ANIL | | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:54 | 7 |
| Shouldn't be a problem turning off spanning tree in this case.
I've seen people turning off STP on remote links in order to not
have disturbances on one side of a far link disrupt an extended LAN
on the other.
Anil
|
1841.3 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:08 | 7 |
|
Thanks for the replys, it looks like this is the config we will go
with.Tell me if my thinking is wrong , the reason we want spanning
tree off is we don't want the remote bridge to become the root bridge
for this network as there are DECbridge 900's in the 4 hubs that are
in the main office.
|
1841.4 | | NETCAD::SLAWRENCE | | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:20 | 3 |
|
Make sure that you set the 90 to do IEEE bridging, not DEC bridging.
|
1841.5 | See note 271 in KALI:::DEWBR | FOUNDR::OUIMETTE | Don't just do something, sit there! | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:32 | 6 |
| See note 271 in the DECbrouter90 conference, KALI::DEWBR. Spanning
tree is *not* disable-able on the DECbrouter90, but there is a way to
create separate, non-communicating 802.1d Spanning Tree domains.
Chuck Ouimette
NSTG
|