[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference netcad::hub_mgnt

Title:DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE
Notice:Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7
Moderator:NETCAD::COLELLADT
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4455
Total number of notes:16761

1833.0. "trap 4 translation support planned?" by MUNICH::SCHALLER (Eva Schaller *DSC* 895-6146) Tue Jan 03 1995 02:53

    
    First of all, my knowledge is absolutely poor concerning
    Hubwatch and MIBs. I had however to take over a call from
    an ill colleague.
    
    Anyway, the customer claims, that specific trap 4s are not interpreted,
    while e.g. 0 traps get translated into text.
    He has Version 3.1 of Hubwatch and wants to know, if any further
    version will contain support for his request (of course he also wants
    an approximate timeframe in this case).
    
    I assume, that you do not plan to interprete vendor specific traps,
    but I would be pleased if somebody could confirm of deny this.
    
    thanks very much in advance
    eva
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name		DateLines
1833.1Which materials??PADNOM::PEYRACHEJean-Yves Peyrache Country Support Group FranceTue Jan 03 1995 07:136
  hello Eva,

  could you described the kind of Material sending this trap 

  jean-yves
1833.2DECagent 90 sends traps 4MUNICH::SCHALLEREva Schaller *DSC* 895-6146Tue Jan 03 1995 10:207
    
    Jean-Yves,
    
    the traps are sent from a DECagent 90 V 2.1.3.
    In the same HUB 90 there is also a DECbridge 90 3.1.
    
    eva
1833.3Mauvaise nouvelle (bad new)PADNOM::PEYRACHEJean-Yves Peyrache Country Support Group FranceTue Jan 03 1995 12:468
  Humm humm, already answered in this conference (1037.*) since 6 months
  
  no really good news for your customer...

  Jean-Yves
1833.4any news after 6 months ?MUNICH::SCHALLEREva Schaller *DSC* 895-6146Wed Jan 04 1995 03:4014
    
    I've read several notes (including 1037) before I wrote my note.
    I know, that the behaviour as seen by the customer is expected and
    not a bug, but a feature.
    
    This is, why I asked for future versions, which would support this
    functionality. Shawn Gallagher said in Note 1037, that they consider
    this support to be implemented in a future release.
    
    But I found nothing concrete about versions or even timeframes.
    Any news since 1037?
    
    Thanks again for an answer
    eva
1833.5money driver.PADNOM::PEYRACHEJean-Yves Peyrache Country Support Group FranceWed Jan 04 1995 07:488
 >>  But I found nothing concrete about versions or even timeframes.
 >>   Any news since 1037?

  it's a pity, i think like other waiting wishes it's a cost/budget
  problem.

  jean-yves
1833.6NETCAD::SLAWRENCEWed Jan 04 1995 09:539
    
    This is actually a good example of _why_ we don't put versions or
    timeframes in this conference - if a planned feature gets dropped or
    deferred we don't have to deal with someone having sold it based on
    outdated information in the notesfile.
    
    By funneling commitments through the product managers, we have a chance
    to understand what we've been commited to.