[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
|
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
1651.0. "Redundant question!" by EEMELI::RUOTILA () Thu Nov 03 1994 02:29
Hi,
I would like to know if the following configuration is OK and
how long it could take before DECswitch 900 EE turns from
Primary to Secondary? As soon as Spanning Tree notice the situation?
I am only interested in the redundancy configuration. My idea is to
build two exactly same way configured DEChub 900 so that HUB1 gives
Primary connection to the devices behind DECrepeater 900FP and
Secondary connection comes from HUB2.
Shortly, HUB1 is Primary and HUB2 is Backup.
Here comes the configuration: P = Primary link
B = Backup link
SEG1 = Thick-Ethernet
SEG2 = Thick-Ethernet
DEBMP = DECSWITCH 900 EE
DEFMM = DECREPEATER 900 FP
P (Optic)
I----------------------------------I
I B (Optic) I
II--------------------------------II
----II---------- ----II----------
!D !D ! ! !D !D ! !
P !E !E ! ! !E !E ! !
----!B !F ! HUB1 ! !B !F ! HUB2 !
I P !M !M ! ! B !M !M ! !
I --!P !M ! ! I----------------!P !M ! !
I I ---------------- I --I--------------
I I----------------------------I I B
I I I I
I I I I
SEG1 *------------------------* *-----------------------* SEG2
I would be very grateful if someone could confirm that this
configuration is OK and access to SEG1 and SEG2 works if HUB1 primary
links fails.
Thanks in advance, Risto
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|