| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1581.1 | Probably MOP. | CGOS01::DMARLOWE | Have you been HUBbed lately? | Mon Oct 17 1994 01:57 | 9 |
| Note 12 makes some mention of how the agent talks to the bridge.
Just by the fact that you can talk to the bridge from NCP, without
an agent, means that you will have to bridge MOP.
If the bridges are required to manage the hubs, maybe you could
put some remote DECagent 90's in place as their price has been reduced
below that of a bridge.
dave
|
| 1581.2 | Either way, $$$ for client - thanks | PTOJJD::DANZAK | Pittsburgher � | Mon Oct 17 1994 09:04 | 8 |
| RE: .-1 That's what we're thinking - however in the original design we
told them that they could manage them all remotely etc. (aarugh) by the
prior network consultant who has now since left. (small wonder)
So we just have to deal with the mess of about 12-16 remote BROUTED
hubs that cannot be managed....aarugh
j
^--who is looking for a dull knife
|
| 1581.3 | RBMS, not MOP | ROGER::GAUDET | Because the Earth is 2/3 water | Mon Oct 17 1994 11:06 | 14 |
| RE: .0
Remote bridges are managed by the DECagent 90 using RBMS (protocol type 80-38).
MOP (protocol type 60-02) is not used at all for the bridges (but is for the
90L/L+ terminal servers).
RE: .2
That network consultant should be drawn and quartered. The DECagent 90 was
NEVER intended to manage remote communities through a DECbrouter 90. If someone
said that it would, not only were they terribly WRONG but they never consulted
engineering about it.
...Roger...
|
| 1581.4 | Point of clarification on MOP | PFSVAX::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Wed Oct 19 1994 16:36 | 11 |
| Re: .3-
>Remote bridges are managed by the DECagent 90 using RBMS (protocol type
>80-38). MOP (protocol type 60-02) is not used at all for the bridges (but
>is for the 90L/L+ terminal servers).
True, RBMS is used by the DECagent 90<-> bridge, however MOP can be
used to directly manage the DEWGB/F via MOP remote console from a DECnet
host or 90L+ terminal port.
Phil
|