T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1485.1 | see note 1193 and 1391 | BIS5::RUTTENS | | Wed Sep 28 1994 05:48 | 6 |
| I experienced exactly the same behaviour of my bridge yesterday.
I will try to solve the problem today using the procedure described in
notes 1193.* and 1391.*.
I will let you know the result.
Rgds.....P.
|
1485.2 | What kind of load did you do? | ROGER::GAUDET | Because the Earth is 2/3 water | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:23 | 9 |
| May I ask how you performed the upgrade? Did you follow the instructions in the
HOW2LOAD.TXT file or the DECbridge 900MX release notes that were supplied with
the DEChub Consolidated Firmware Kit V1.1? I ask this because it is possible
that if you tried to do a MAM-assisted upgrade from v1.2.1 to v1.4.0 it might
corrupt the firmware image. You must perform a direct load of v1.4.0 (i.e.
assign the bridge an IP address and use that address to perform the load). If
you did this, then I do not know why the load failed.
...Roger...
|
1485.3 | | BIS5::RUTTENS | | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:46 | 17 |
| I did a direct load (no MAM assisted upgrade).
So, this morning I tried to get my bridge up and running with the
assistance of one of our UNIX-specialists. We used the procedure as
described in note 1193 and 1391.
We managed to load the v1.4 firmware but the module always
reinitializes it self after a few seconds "MODULE OK" lit-up.
So, after power on the "POWER OK" LED lits and the module goes into a
sequence of selftest and associated LED-patterns going on and off.
After a while "port state #" of port 2 light yellow and a few seconds
later "MODULE OK" comes on. Again a few seconds later the module
reinitialize.
Does anyone knows a workarround for this strange behaviour ?
|
1485.4 | direct load | OTOOA::KUNKEL | | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:16 | 7 |
| re .2
I performed the upgrade using the direct load method, ie assign an ip
address to the bridge module then use decndup to blast the firmware to
the ip address assigned to the bridge.
Mike K.
|
1485.5 | | NETCAD::SLAWRENCE | | Wed Sep 28 1994 18:27 | 12 |
|
Far and away the easiest way to get into this situation (I have no way
of knowing if this applies to these particular cases, of course) is to
be impatient. The bridge takes a _LONG_ time to write the flash memory
after the image is downloaded (and the image load itself can be very
slow too under some network conditions). If you power cycle the bridge
when that flash write is in progress you _will_ corrupt the image and
get a 'brain-dead' bridge.
A good rule of thumb: DON'T reset a device manually after a download
until it has come all the way back up to normal operation by itself.
|
1485.6 | | KAOFS::S_HYNDMAN | Acronym Decoder Ring Architect | Wed Sep 28 1994 18:34 | 9 |
|
Is a "_LONG_" time in the order of 2 mins, 5 mins, 10 mins, an
hour???
I've got 11 bridges (plus repeaters, mams) to upgrade and I don't
want to get these screwed up. It was a long enough wait just to get
these.
Scott
|
1485.7 | 3-5 minutes to write flash | OTOOA::KUNKEL | | Wed Sep 28 1994 21:14 | 27 |
| re .5 & .6
A long time is in the order of 3-5 minutes ( when you are waiting of
course this seems like an eternity ! )
I was able to successfully load the bridge via Bootp with the latest
firmware image, patience is a virtue, and you do need access to a Bootp
server to correct a corrupted firmware image.
History Lesson
The original problem was due to the customer loading the image,
resetting the bridge before the image was written to flash, and
compounded by the fact that the port the bridge uses to issue the Bootp
request ( port 2) was defective (ie dropping bits, verified with a
lan-analyzer).
I compounded the problem by upgrading a unit from spares, and did not wait
the required time for the image to write to flash, hence another bridge
with a corrupted image.
Moral of the story, read the release notes very carefully, and
wait, wait, wait !!!! Also, ensure you have a Bootp server available,
and backups of the current firmware images, in the event ( this can
happen to you ) of a corrupted image, or you will be very unhappy camper !!!
Mike K.
|
1485.8 | RE: BootP load and virtues of patience... :-) | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Thu Sep 29 1994 10:48 | 12 |
| Hi Mike - I just got back to the office after being up in our
ASO mfg plant since Monday. I got your phone message, and then
checked in here. Looks like you got your answers to your problem.
Scott is right when he says, be patient on the load process.
The description in note 1193.1 is very accurate when describing
the process to use when it has been determined that the bridge
image got corrupted somehow either in the process of doing an
upgrade or for whatever other possible reasons.
you mentioned something about the bridge port used to do the load
being bad or flakey. Could you elaborate on this a little more?
Bob
|
1485.9 | No bootp requests anymore | BIS5::RUTTENS | | Thu Sep 29 1994 15:31 | 9 |
| In my case I have the "port two" LED lighting yellow from time to time.
This during the sequence of reinitializing and selftesting all the
time.
So, this bridge doesn't even sent bootp requests anymore. I think I
came to a point of no return and I have field-service my bridge
swapped for a new one allready loaded with V1.4.
P.
|
1485.10 | Defective AUI port | OTOOA::KUNKEL | | Thu Sep 29 1994 23:27 | 12 |
| re .8
I determined port 2 was defective on the bridge by monitoring the Bootp
request packet with a lan-analyzer, the source and destination
addresses in the packet header were corrupted, ie FF-FE-FF-FF-FE-FF
instead of the ethernet broadcast address of all F's, 08-00-2A-
XX-XX-XX instead of the digital assigned 08-00-2B-XX-XX-XX mac address,
leading me to believe the aui interface was intermittently dropping bits.
Mike K.
|