T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1391.1 | Need additional info | DELNI::ROUNDS | | Thu Sep 08 1994 07:14 | 14 |
| Giles,
Make sure no pins are bent on the bridge. Do a visual inspection.
Have you tried the bridge in different slots in the DECHUB900?
This eliminates a bad slot in the hub.
Does it comeup in a different DEChub900?
Sometimes, you need to physically add and take out a module in a hub
several times to establish pin connectivity. Have you tried that?
I am just trying to eliminate some mechanical knowns.
|
1391.2 | Version of code,hw? | DELNI::ROUNDS | | Thu Sep 08 1994 07:16 | 2 |
| Also, while in the docking station (I assume a 90watt), per the bridge
menu, what is its current hw,rom,sw version?
|
1391.3 | DECBridge 900MX problems | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Thu Sep 08 1994 08:49 | 21 |
| Hi,
I have tried 3 different DECBridge 900s in all slots from 4 to 8
with no success, even reseating them several times as you suggested.
I only have one HUB to play with so I cannot try another. The Hub
Manager reports the device being added/removed but always says device
type unknown. The Hub is ok as I have currently a DR900TM in slot 1,
a DS900TM in slot 2, a DR900FP in slot 3, a WANrouter 90 in slot 5 and
a DB90FL in slot 6.
When pulgging any of the three bridges into a docking station, I
cannot talk to them via the setup port using a terminal or via a
reverse lat port from the DECserver 900. This means I cannot see the
menu and therefore what they have configured software wise.
Should I be using the OBM port with a H8571-J or the port where the
MP cable plugs straight in ? I have tried an MP to MMP cable from a
terminal and a MP-MP cable to the DECserver port.
Giles.
|
1391.4 | I have a hunch but need more info..... | NACAD2::BATTERSBY | | Thu Sep 08 1994 10:40 | 9 |
| Giles - When you have one of these bridges plugged into a docking
station, as you mentioned the mod_ok led comes on and the power
led is on. If you were to plug a lan cable (UTP or AUI), I'd be
interested in knowing if the ports come up in forwarding. Also
please tell me if you can, the serial number if the bridges and
also please verify that the docking station being used is a 90
watt docking station and not a 45 watt docking station.
Bob
|
1391.5 | DECBridge 900 SNs | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Thu Sep 08 1994 11:35 | 11 |
|
OK, I am using a 90W docking station and the Mod_Ok light is not
lit, as I previously thought it was. If I plug an AUI cable into the
the top AUI port the LED lights ok, the led marked with a # lights
at regular intervals and then goes off again.
The bridge serial numbers are : AS40300147
AS40300156
AS41200232
Giles.
|
1391.6 | Almost sounds like they are sending bootp requests... | NACAD2::BATTERSBY | | Thu Sep 08 1994 12:48 | 12 |
| If what you are telling me is correct, that is, that the state led
# for port 2 (your top AUI port), lights up at regular intervals and
goes out, anf then repeats again. While this is occuring, the
traffic activity led -> adjacent to this led is indicating traffic.
If this is what you are seeing, then I have a hunch the bridges
are possibly brain dead and are sending out bootp requests to perform
a primitive load. There is a note (I think it's 1193.1), with
suggestions on how to set up your bootp server to respond to the
bootp requests possibly coming from these bridges.
Otherwise, I myself don't have any other suggestions.
Bob
|
1391.7 | DECBridge 900MX lights are on, know one home | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Thu Sep 08 1994 13:14 | 4 |
| Thanks for your help Bob, I will look at the note mentioned and
see if I can load them.
Giles.
|
1391.8 | | NACAD::ANIL | | Thu Sep 08 1994 19:45 | 21 |
| Given the symptoms, this is almost certainly the problem.
A couple of suggestions. When you encounter a problem, check the
"Problem Solving" section in the Installation Manual. This problem
is described clearly in there, for example.
Secondly, the only way you can corrupt the Flash in this way
is to power down the unit while a Flash downline upgrade is in
process. There is a rather strongly worded caution in lots of
places (including the Installation Manual, Release notes, and Setup
menu) that says not to power down the unit during a downline
upgrade. In the case of the DECbridge 900MX which has 4 MB of Flash,
it takes up to 5 minutes to load. LEAVE THE UNIT ALONE DURING
THESE 5 MINUTES! It will reboot itself when the load is complete.
(This is true for all hub products.) The problem is that if you unplug
the unit in the middle, then only part of the image has been programmed
into the non-volatile Flash memory; as a result you have some of the
new image and some of the old one, which is basically a corrupted image
that the bridge cannot execute (a CRC failure is detected by selftest).
Anil
|
1391.9 | | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Mon Sep 12 1994 05:21 | 11 |
|
These Bridges were loaned to me after another group had been testing
them, so I guess they must have been screwing with them in a major
way.
By the way, I did check the Problem Solving section but wanted to be
sure that I was seeing whats described before getting them replaced.
Thanks again for the help.
Giles.
|
1391.10 | Curious as to whether our assumption was right..... | NACAD2::BATTERSBY | | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:05 | 3 |
| Did you try setting up a load server to see if they would load?
Bob
|
1391.11 | Load in progress.... | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Wed Sep 14 1994 10:18 | 4 |
| Just read your note Bob, trying it as I write. I'll let you know
whether I can get one working or not.
Giles.
|
1391.12 | Bridges won't load | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Wed Sep 14 1994 11:03 | 18 |
| Bob,
Tried loading two of the Bridges via the HUB_LOAD.COM file
but neither will load as I get the following :-
download load 08-00-2B-A3-4D-90 MOM$LOAD:DEFBA140.BIN /force=pcommon
/pass="public"
(c) Digital Equipment Corporation. 1993. All Rights Reserved.
%NDU-E-READ_DEVICE, error during read device
%NDU-E-NORESP_ERR, no response from target
%NONAME-E-NOMSG, Message number 00000002
As the Hub900 reports the line cards for the bridges as not active
I cannot load them by the Hub either, so I guess I'll have to wait for
Field Service to replace them anyway.
Giles.
|
1391.13 | Can't MOP load a DECbridge 900MX | ROGER::GAUDET | Because the Earth is 2/3 water | Wed Sep 14 1994 11:40 | 8 |
| Giles,
Why are you trying to load the DECbridge 900MX by specifying the MAC address?
That won't work. This causes NDU to attempt a MOP load which the bridge doesn't
support. You have to specify the bridge's IP address so a TFTP load will be
initiated.
...Roger...
|
1391.14 | And connect bridge to LAN via port #2 (AUI port) | NACAD2::BATTERSBY | | Wed Sep 14 1994 12:58 | 11 |
| Giles - Also, in addition to what Roger said, don't forget
that there should be an AUI cable on port #2 (the first AUI
port on the DECbridge 900MX). If the bridge then starts the
load procedure, you should see the state leds walk through
from left to right as the TFTP load commences, bridge verifies
checksum, then writes loaded image in two parts to respective
flash memories, FDDI image, and then main image.
As Roger said, the TFTP primitive load is done using in-band
connectivity.
Bob
|
1391.15 | Cannot set IP address on Bridge | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Thu Sep 15 1994 05:27 | 20 |
| Bob/Roger,
Ok, appologies for misunderstanding this sequence, I have now
tried to redo this using the IP address I had registered for the
bridge but the load I get :-
.
.
.
[PCOMMON] Getting sysDescr
DECNDU: ERROR STATUS = No response from device.
when trying to load the first Bridge. What I don't understand is,
if I havent been able to talk to the Bridges all along either through
the Hub 900 backplane or via a terminal connected to a DEChub One, then
I havent been able to set the IP address on the Bridge so how does it
know that this is its IP address, and the load is for it ..?
Giles.
|
1391.16 | Bridge sends out BOOTP requests when brain-dead... | NACAD::BATTERSBY | | Thu Sep 15 1994 11:41 | 13 |
| If the bridge is truely brain-dead, it has enough primitive code
in ROM to perform the TFTP primitive load without needing an
IP address. What the bridge does is to send out a BOOTP request
executed from the code in ROM. Thus all one should have to do
if one suspects the bridge is brain-dead is to connect (in this
case of your bridges), an AUI cable to port #2 of the bridge and
apply power to it (either in stand-alone in a DEChub ONE or in a
HUB). Assuming you have set up a system to act as a load server as
described in that other note I made reference to, the bridge if it
is brain-dead should load. If the bridge (and the other two), don't
load, then there is something else wrong with them.
Bob
|
1391.17 | Re-read note 1193.1 | NACAD::BATTERSBY | | Thu Sep 15 1994 11:44 | 4 |
| Giles - Please re-read note 1193.1, and you should understand what
we are saying.
Bob
|
1391.18 | LED Light 1 not lit | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Fri Sep 16 1994 10:42 | 7 |
| Bob,
I have followed the correct procedure but the Bridge does not have
the 1 LED lit to indicate BOOTP requests being sent out.
Giles.
|
1391.19 | | NETCAD::ANIL | | Mon Sep 19 1994 22:55 | 22 |
| OK, one last try! (This note should probably be retitled to something
like "Repairing Corrupted Flash on DB900MX", so others can benefit
from it later.)
You mentioned that an LED marked with # goes on and off at regular
intervals (should be every 8 seconds). This is the indication, with
later revs of boot block, that a BootP request is being sent out
regularly.
When Flash is corrupted, you CANNOT use the normal load procedure.
At this point, the bridge does not remember its IP address and does
not have the smarts to process the SNMP used by NDU. In this "primitive"
mode, the module will look for a BootP server to tell it two things:
a) what its IP address is (so it can go on to do TFTP),
b) the IP address of the server, and the filename of the image it can TFTP
into its Flash to fix itself. The note referenced by Bob seems to
describe the procedure correctly, at least for an ULTRIX BootP server.
(If you have a different machine you want to use as a BootP server,
see the man pages on it to figure out how to set up BootP.)
Anil
|
1391.20 | Bridge Port failure | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Tue Sep 20 1994 08:34 | 75 |
|
OK, my last try! Mr Moderator please change this notes title, re -1.
I had configured a VMS 5.5-2 system with UCX 3.1 and enabled the
BOOTP/TFTP service as instructed. I had set the hardware address in the
ARP cache and added an entry in the BOOTP table eg:
UCX> set arp 08-00-2b-a3-4d-90 db900mx.reo.dec.com
UCX> sho arp
ARP table entries
Ethernet Internet Host name ARP status
AA-00-04-00-EA-AA 16.36.0.134 msuman.reo.dec.com INUSE CMPL
AA-00-04-00-5B-AB 16.36.0.4 INUSE CMPL
AA-00-04-00-FF-AB 16.36.0.2 INUSE CMPL
08-00-2B-A3-4D-90 16.36.0.173 INUSE CMPL
UCX> set bootp db900mx/hard=address=08-00-2b-a3-4d-90/file=defba140.bin
UCX> show bootp/fu
Host: 16.36.0.173
Hardware Address:
08-00-2B-A3-4D-90
Network mask: 255.0.0.0 Type: Ethernet
File: DEFBA140.BIN
Time offset: 0 Vendor:
Gateways: not defined
Servers:
Cookie: not defined
IEN: not defined
Impress: not defined
Log: not defined
LPR: not defined
Name: not defined
Resource: not defined
Time: not defined
UCX>
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 20-SEP-1994 11:23:26.06 %%%%%%%%%%%
Message from user INTERnet on QUAD
INTERnet ACP TFTP Accept Request from Host: 16.36.0.173 Port: 65529
The Bridge then goes through the process of illuminating the port state
LEDs from port 2 through 6 in turn. All the port state LEDS then
alternate with a green flash then yellow flash a couple of times and
then I am left with port 2 permanently yellow, which is a port failure
according to the "Problem Solving using the LEDs" section.
I seem to be able to sort of talk to the console port but only get a
letter "o" with an accent above, for every carriage return at 9600 baud.
Looks like I have a further weeks wait at least on a replacement through
Field Service on top of the two weeks already. Just as well this is
just me trying to get to know the Bridge and not a failure of a live
unit somewhere on the UK LAN. Is it really supposed to be this
difficult for Engineers to get a replacment on P1 from the US for
new modules that are released.
I hope external customers in the UK don't have to wait this long. I was
informed there were not only no replacement units in the UK, but there
were none in Nijmegan either so they have to be brought in from the US.
Anyway, many thanks for all the help and pointers, I have certainly
learned plenty that I would otherwise not have known about. I have
always thought that before manuals/products are released they should
be tested by someone with no experience of the subject as people in at
the deep end can very easily forget whats its like to approach the
subject from scratch.
Cheers,
Giles.
|
1391.21 | Rogue units ! | TOOK::MILLBRANDT | termite in the ark | Mon Sep 26 1994 17:45 | 22 |
| > The Bridge then goes through the process of illuminating the port state
> LEDs from port 2 through 6 in turn. All the port state LEDS then
> alternate with a green flash then yellow flash a couple of times and
> then I am left with port 2 permanently yellow, which is a port failure
> according to the "Problem Solving using the LEDs" section.
That permanently yellow port 2 LED is highly symptomatic of a wanna-be
V2.0 DB900MX - the brouter version that was not productized. An older
version of the debug boot block for a V2.0 will request a download and
report a successful download just as you described. The yellow port 2 LED
indicates that the ROM is waiting to sync up with the MRI XRAY symbolic
debugger.
A phone call with Giles verified that these units came from the Reading
group that had been working on V2.0.
These boards are out of hardware rev as well as firmware rev. While you
could try taking the units apart and removing any jumpers you find, to
get rid of the pause for XRAY, I suspect other boot ROM differences will
prevent you from having a bona fide DB900MX.
Dotsie
|
1391.22 | Three months to replace a Bridge !! | RDGENG::GREID | Bang that head that doesn't Bang ! | Tue Sep 27 1994 06:43 | 8 |
| Looks like it will be Christmas before we get any replacements for
these Bridges as I have been informed that due to problems making them,
no units will be shipping over to the UK during the months of October
and November. This is very frustrating as it means not only can we not
test the Bridge, we cannot purchase any for use on the LAN here at
REO.
Giles.
|