T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1312.1 | | NPSS::MDLYONS | Michael D. Lyons - Young enough and dumb enough | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:50 | 2 |
| ...check out the comp.dcom.lans.fddi newsgroup for a recent
firestorm there regarding support for IP fragmentation (or lack of it.)
|
1312.2 | How do you access newsgroups? | DPDMAI::DAVIES | Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant | Tue Aug 16 1994 14:20 | 8 |
| I am not familiar with accessing the "comp.dcom.lans.fddi newsgroups".
How would one do that?
Thanks,
Mark
|
1312.3 | Mike is referring to the usenet newsgroup access | NACAD2::BATTERSBY | | Tue Aug 16 1994 15:45 | 9 |
| Mark I think Mike is referring to the usenet access to the
newsgroup using one of the tools like "VNEWS". In the newsgroup
titled comp.dcom.lans.fddi, there are at least 25-30 or so articles
discussing the EIFO switch. The title of the articles is...
"EIFO Ethernet/FDDI Switch". I haven't read them all myself, but there
might be some info that Mike alludes to to pull out of there to use.
Bob
|
1312.4 | | KAOFS::S_HYNDMAN | Acronym Decoder Ring Architect | Tue Aug 16 1994 17:14 | 7 |
|
Might want to also check if Scott Bradner's lab has tested it inorder
to obtain performance data.
Scott
|
1312.5 | Thanks. | DPDMAI::DAVIES | Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant | Tue Aug 16 1994 17:20 | 1 |
|
|
1312.6 | EIFO does not IP fragment | NACAD::SLAWRENCE | | Wed Aug 17 1994 17:10 | 11 |
| I just checked out that thread in the newsgroup - it gets off the track
and kind of heated fairly quickly, but the important point is that the
EIFO switch does not fragment IP messages in FDDI frames down to
Ethernet size. The DECbridge900 does this at full ethernet wire speed.
This can have a very substantial impact on NFS - especially if you have
some NFS that is FDDI-FDDI and others that must go through the bridge.
The only way to use the EIFO in such a case is to artificially limit
the MTU on the FDDI down to the ethernet maximum size; a big
performance loss on the FDDI, and the system for the FDDI-FDDI uses.
|
1312.7 | | NPSS::MDLYONS | Michael D. Lyons - Young enough and dumb enough | Fri Aug 19 1994 10:54 | 16 |
| Re: previous replies
...sorry for not responding earlier - I don't follow this
conference on a daily basis. I communicated with Mark via mail earlier
this week and gave pointers to newsgroup software... ..My personal
preference is the Motif version of XRN...
..fyi, some additional notes conferences which are related to
newsgroups and newsgroup software:
UPSAR::NEWS-BACKBONE
UFP::XRN
Thanks to Bob and Scott for the extra info... Scott's summary
covers what I was referring to...
|
1312.8 | What RFC for rebuilding fragmented messages? | DPDMAI::DAVIES | Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant | Fri Aug 26 1994 09:14 | 10 |
| re: .6
Can one assume that most Unix implementations (including Digital's)
support the rebuilding of fragmented messages? Which RFC would this be
covered under?
Thanks,
Mark
|
1312.9 | RFC pointers | NACAD2::SLAWRENCE | | Fri Aug 26 1994 10:50 | 14 |
|
RFC 791 "Internet Protocol" requires that any IP destination support
reassembly.
RFC 1122
"Requirements for Internet Hosts -- Communication Layers" adds:
3.2.1.4 Fragmentation and Reassembly: RFC-791 Section 3.2
The Internet model requires that every host support
reassembly. See Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 for the
requirements on fragmentation and reassembly.
|
1312.10 | Thanks. | DPDMAI::DAVIES | Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant | Fri Aug 26 1994 11:53 | 4 |
| Thanks a LOT,
Mark
|