|
I'll pass this along - maybe it will be of help to someone.
=========================================================================
From: RANGER::MAJEWSKI "25-Jul-1994 1128 -0400" 25-JUL-1994 11:34:38.76
To: NETCAD::PARK
CC:
Subj: RE: Is there anyone can help me on this?
Jae, without a better description than "this seems not to work", we can
only guess at what the problem or issue might be.
PATHWORKS engineering recently received an escalation about poor performance
with the 3C503 and PATHWORKS. We recommended the following parameter
changes for tuning purposes, and the IPMT case was closed. Maybe these will
help in this case, but I do not know for sure.
vivianne
From: RANGER::MAJEWSKI 5-JUL-1994 14:13:25.15
To: larose,mike_s,holmes
CC: MAJEWSKI
Subj: cfs15795
I am the supervisor assigned this escalation. Please have the customer
implement the parameter changes indicated below and tell us the
results. According to the resident expert (Mitch), this is a known
problem and all three changes have to be made (not just one of them).
vivianne
<<< RANGER::NOTES:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CLIENT_CLDS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Client CLD Repository >-
================================================================================
Note 362.1 cfs15795: slow perf w/5.0a and 3c503 1 of 1
RANGER::MAJEWSKI 17 lines 5-JUL-1994 14:10
-< change some parameters.... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a resident performance expert (can you guess who? ;-) ) has made the
following recommendations:
PROTOCOL.INI
xmitbuffs=1
STARTNET/.TPL file
DNP /FC:1 (changing flow control)
NCP
def exec receive pipe quota 3
def exec transmit pipe quota 3
... then reboot!
All of these things need to be done (not just one of them, as is
indicated in the CLD).
============================================================================
<<< NETCAD::$1$DUA77:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HUB_MGNT.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Hub Management Conference >-
================================================================================
Note 963.0 3COM Etherlink and HUBwatch V2.0? No replies
STKHLM::DUFVA "Nils Dufva - TSSC G�vle Sweden" 19 lines 6-MAY-1994 04:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Here in Sweden we have currently three different customers that are
trying to install HUBwatch for windows on PCs equipped with Etherlinks
II-cards (3C503) and this seemes not to work.
I'm not working with PCs myself, but according to the PC-folks here,
the ENKII.DOS V1.1 driver is not compatible with Pathworks V5 (that
is, LANmanager V2.2).
I checked with 3COM support in the UK, but there where no later
version of the driver. They admitted to have heard about `some
problems with LANmanager V2.2B'.
This should mean that HUBwatch/Windows V2.0 will never work on a PC
with an Etherlink controller. Have anyone else tried this configuration
and if so, did it work?
Nils.
|