[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference netcad::hub_mgnt

Title:DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE
Notice:Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7
Moderator:NETCAD::COLELLADT
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4455
Total number of notes:16761

1123.0. "Hubwatch for Ultrix V1.1 & Decbridge90 filtering" by KERNEL::WARDJO () Thu Jun 16 1994 12:31

    Hello,
    
    I have a customer who is running Hubwatch V1.1 for Ultrix with a
    dechub90, decagent 90 (V1.1) and decbridge 90 (V3.0).
    
    He is trying to implement protocol filtering on the Decbridge90 and is
    having problems.
    
    He double clicks on the bridge, selects the filtering option, chooses
    the protocol he wants and the type of filtering and then selects
    "apply". After doing this the entry disappears and is not added (no
    entries are added). There is no message in the hubwatch start up
    window.
    
    Has anyone seen this before and can offer an explanation?
    Is V1.1 on Ultrix still supported?
    
    I tried to use ccr to the bridge, but a connection only lasts about 5
    seconds before it is disconnected with 
    "ccr Retry limit exceeded"
    "ccr: Remote console released"
    
    I can't reproduce this as I only have Hubwatch for VMS V2.0 & V3.0 &
    filtering works on these versions.
    
    Thanks for any help.
    
    Jon
    
                                      
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1123.1Still not working...KERNEL::WARDJOMon Jul 11 1994 12:3516
    Can anyone tell me if Hubwatch for Ultrix V1.1 is supported.
    
    I got the customer to upgrade his decbridge90 from V3.0 to V3.1 and he
    found that having done one bridge, his other 10 could not see each
    other (I don't know exactly what the problem was, but no one on his Lan
    could work). After upgradeing all bridges it was ok again.
    
    Anyone seen anything like this before - are v3.0 & V3.1 incompatable?
    
    The original problem still persists - Can anyone help.
    
    
    Thanks
    
    Jon
    
1123.2SLINK::HOODI'd rather be at the KennebecMon Jul 11 1994 13:033
(Answered via mail)

Tom Hood