T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
615.1 | Don't know, but would like to know. | SLINK::HOOD | I'd rather be surfing | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:20 | 5 |
| If you find out, can you please post the answer.
Thanks,
Tom Hood
HUBwatch
|
615.2 | :*) | KERNEL::LLOYDA | Don't worry... Be Happy ;^) | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:36 | 9 |
| Tom,
I had hoped you could tell me !!! I suppose I'll have to go and dig out
a VXT 2000+ and try it all out on (I suppose I was being lazy).
If anyone else has it running please let me know.
Alan.
|
615.3 | 10 megs maybe? | DV780::SMITHR | | Thu Jan 20 1994 09:37 | 9 |
| If it is any help, oone of my customers is running Hubwatch using the
VXT2000+ with 10 megs of memory. When he ordered the VXT he was
informed that 10 megs was minimum for most windowing applications. I
don't know how true this is, but we don't have any problems running
Hubwatch.
For what it is worth,
Rich
|
615.4 | solved | KERNEL::LLOYDA | Don't worry... Be Happy ;^) | Thu Jan 20 1994 13:18 | 8 |
| Hi,
Thanks for the reply... it transpires that the customer is using a VAX
based load on a VXT with only 4Meg of memory. The minimum supported
amount of memory for a host based load is 10 meg. 4 Meg will work if he
loads of an infoserver.
Al.
|
615.5 | acc vio with 18 meg. | COMICS::WARDJ | | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:25 | 14 |
| Hello,
I have a customer with a vxt 2000+ (18meg) and he is getting an access
violation when running hubwatch.
He creates a Lat x session, fires up hubwatch, double clicks on a
module and then gets the acc vio.
Anyone got any ideas on what I should be looking for?
Thanks
Jon
|
615.6 | | SLINK::HOOD | I'd rather be surfing | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:48 | 9 |
| Does it crash on all their x terminals? Does it crash if display is set
to a workstation somewhere?
If it's repeatable, then please submit a QAR, with as many details about the
display and hub hardware as possible. Also include instructions on how to
re-create the problem.
Tom Hood
HUBwatch
|
615.7 | | VASSAR::WADE | Network Systems Support | Wed Feb 09 1994 11:21 | 5 |
| re .6
I'm pretty sure that this customer is running HUBwatch for VMS
V1.1. Is this something that is clearly fixed in V2.0?
|
615.8 | Something to keep in mind... | SLINK::HOOD | I'd rather be surfing | Wed Feb 09 1994 11:29 | 15 |
| The fine print:
--------------
Please keep in mind the X-terminals are not officially supported by
HUBwatch V1.1 and V2.0. They are *not* listed in the SPD for HUBwatch.
What this means is that HUBwatch was not tested on them. While many people
seem to be able to run with them, it is not a guaranteed configuration.
Otherwise:
---------
V1.1 is pretty old [ by our standards ;-) ]. V2.0 fixed numerous bugs
from 1.1. As Bill suggested, try the newer version.
Tom Hood
HUBwatch
|