T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
578.1 | should run | ZUR01::SCHNEIDERR | | Wed Dec 22 1993 05:09 | 36 |
| > +--------+-+-+ +-------+-+-+
> | six |9|9| | six |9|9|
> | 900TM |0|0| ... total 20..| 900TM |0|0|
> | repeat |0|0| 900 Hubs | repeat|0|0|
> | er's |B|B| | er's |B|B|
> +--------+++++ +-------+++++
> | | Two DAS | |two DAS
> | | attach | | attach
> ---+-+-------------------------+-+-----
> ---------------------------------------
> FDDI ring
It depends your configuration. Each bridge is able to connect one FDDI ring to
6 Ethernet channels. In your drawing it seems like your FDDI ring is outside of
the HUB.
Now you have two possibilities:
- Each of your bridge connects the FDDI to only one Ethernet segment. Example
bridge 1 connects FDDI to Ethernet 1,2,3 and bridge 2 connects FDDI to Ethernet
4,5,6. In this case all bridges are forwarding, because you have no loop ( no
redundance).
- Both bridges connect the FDDI to the same Ethernet. Example: bridge 1
connects FDDI to Ethernet 1,2,3,4 and bridge 2 connects FDDI to Ethernet
1,2,3,4. In this case you have a loop and spanning tree (btw..not spinning
tree) makes one of the bridges to go in backup mode.
----> should be no problem.
Remeber: To config the Bridge900 to separate backplane-channels (Ethernets),
you need HUBwatch 3.0. Availible in spring 94.
Roland
|
578.2 | should run and..... | QUIVER::GALLAGHER | | Wed Dec 22 1993 10:00 | 19 |
| >- Both bridges connect the FDDI to the same Ethernet. Example: bridge 1
>connects FDDI to Ethernet 1,2,3,4 and bridge 2 connects FDDI to Ethernet
>1,2,3,4. In this case you have a loop and spanning tree (btw..not spinning
>tree) makes one of the bridges to go in backup mode.
.....and this gives you some of the fault tolerance you're looking for.
You have a forwarding bridge and a backup bridge on each segment. If the
forwarding bridge fails, the backup bridge will become a forwarding bridge
*after* the time it takes to detect the spanning tree change plus
a configurable amount of pre-forwarding delay. I believe the spanning
tree converges in a few seconds and the default pre-forwarding delay
is 30 seconds.
> Does the spinning tree
> protocol spread thru the whole ring or just the two bridges in e-net.
The spanning tree works on all bridges throughout the bridged LAN.
-Shawn
|
578.3 | performance? | VNABRW::PARGFRIEDER | | Wed Dec 22 1993 10:52 | 8 |
|
never answered...
Does anybody know the forwarding and filtering rates of
the DECHUB900 FDDI Bridge??
Alfred
|
578.4 | | QUIVER::SLAWRENCE | | Wed Dec 22 1993 10:58 | 4 |
| As fast as we can make it... :-)
More seriously - it's not done yet, so any numbers would be premature.
I doubt you'll be disappointed - those guys are all performance freaks.
|
578.5 | How fast is fast? | CGOS01::DMARLOWE | dsk dsk dsk (tsk tsk tsk) | Wed Dec 22 1993 13:52 | 10 |
| re. .-1
I have heard some of numbers that they think it will do and suffice
to say you should be able to have several Enet ports running at full
theoretical speed (14,880pps) and still have headroom for the other
ports.
Maybe by Network Academy testing will be done and numbers verified.
dave
|
578.6 | | LEVERS::ANIL | | Wed Dec 22 1993 13:57 | 17 |
| At FCS of the DECbridge 900MX, the Ethernets and FDDI will not be
able to "LAN hop", with one exception: an Ethernet port will be
switchable between the thinwire on the backplane and the front panel
using the Setup port. This is only a temporary menu item, not
manageable by HUBwatch -- as someone else mentioned, an upcoming
release of HUBwatch is expected to support separate backplane
LAN connections for each of the Ethernet ports as well as the FDDI.
In the meantime, external wiring can be used to connect hub repeaters
and concentrators to bridge ports.
As far as performance numbers, they should become available soon.
For advance information on the bridge, please contact the product
manager Jane Brechlin.. since the product isn't yet announced,
I'm not sure what information can be made available in a public
conference.
Anil
|