[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE |
Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 |
Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT |
|
Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4455 |
Total number of notes: | 16761 |
380.0. "help in a LAN-WAN configuration" by ROM01::CENCI (nec metus nec spes) Tue Sep 07 1993 06:44
Hello,
I'll have to face competition at a prospect customer.
I haven't got a thorough knowledge of our hub products offering;
your help is thus welcome.
The customer wants to install 8 Ethernet LANs; all the LANs are remote
to one another as they are located in different cities.
On every Ethernet there will be few SCO-UNIX PCs. Internet protocols
will be used to transfer files, emulate terminals, etc.
Every LAN will be connected via 2 leased lines to 2 remote LANs via
TCP/IP, in a ring-like configuration (for redundancy).
They'll have to do basic network management (from an help desk on one
of the LANs), for example, they'll need to check if a remote router is
working well, and take appropriate action should any router fail (the
help desk operator could open a call).
Winning the bid of course implies our being able to keep costs low.
What do you suggest? The problem I have to face is that they don't
want to buy load hosts at each site, and keep on using their PCs.
If I offered them a DEChub 90, with 2 DECwanrouter 90s per site (they need
two WAN ports as I said before), and a DECserver 90M per site with a
FLASH memory for the UNIX PCs, I would still need 8 load hosts for the
routers. Am I wrong?
And what about a simple and cheap network management solution for
such a limited network? They want a centralized workstation to set
up an help desk, so that an operator gets a warning when a router's
state change.
Thanks a lot for any suggested configuration.
Fabio
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
380.1 | | TMAWKO::PRESSLEY | pin heads are people too... | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:19 | 4 |
| Use the decbrouter 90. It does not require a download and comes with two WAN
ports.
Use hubwatch for the pc for network management of the hub products.
|
380.2 | | ROM01::CENCI | nec metus nec spes | Fri Sep 10 1993 05:59 | 16 |
| Thanks. Would you please tell me what the advantages of using Hubwatch
for Windows are in controlling local and remote routers?
If I am not wrong, the DECbrouter 90s support SNMP and can be kept
under control simply by connecting via TELNET to the router's console.
The HUBwatch gives you a graphical interface, but does it require
some skills to check whether a line or a router are experiencing faults
of any sort?
And... do you need DECagent 90 as well (how many cards for 8 hubs?)
Thanks for your help
Fabio
|
380.3 | Telnet, HUBwatch, and DECagent needs | NAC::FORREST | | Fri Oct 29 1993 09:17 | 15 |
|
HUBwatch for Windows does not currently support Telnet. You would
probably have to use another package to get Telnet and reboot the
PC each time you wanted to switch.
It does require some skills to troubleshoot the fault. If you add
the DECbrouter to the HUBwatch map, then it will turn red if you
lose connectivity to it. But if one path to it is still active,
then the icon will remain green. I'm not sure if the DECbrouter
will send a link down trap, but that could help too.
You need 1 DECagent 90 per 8 single (non-daisy-chained) hubs,
assuming they are all on the same LAN. I would recommend 1
DECagent per remote site, unless there are more than 8 hubs
at the site.
|