| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 359.1 | a quick answer | 57265::HOOD | I'd rather be surfing | Thu Aug 26 1993 17:13 | 8 |
| A quick answer: No.
Slightly longer answer:
V1.1 = MIPS/ULTRIX and OpenVMS VAX,
V2.0 = OpenVMS VAX
V2.1 = <?> maybe.
Tom Hood
|
| 359.2 | OSF/1 needed soonish... | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Sun Aug 29 1993 09:08 | 5 |
| re: .1
I would assume that it is fairly obvious that it is needed on
OSF/1 coincident with POLYCENTER Netview right?
Mike - only slightly bruised from the DECUS reaction to our
network management strategy :-}
|
| 359.3 | Need is obvious; priority is not... | NAC::FORREST | | Tue Sep 21 1993 18:53 | 13 |
|
It is obvious to us that we need HUBwatch on Windows, VMS, OSF/1,
HP OpenView, SunNet Manager, etc. Something has to fall off the
list.
Which platform, HP OpenView (Unix) or Polycenter NetView (OSF), will
make it easier for you to sell DEChubs? I expect some of you will
say HP and some will say Polycenter NetView, depending on your
particular customers.
We want to prioritize by most hub sales per management platform,
but sometimes ease of engineering makes one more attractive than
another.
|
| 359.4 | for demo, try mx'ing the ULTRIX version ! | SEAWLF::COLE | ADEG Programs Team/Greenbelt,Md | Thu Sep 23 1993 09:39 | 14 |
|
If you want it for demo purposes on OSF/1, try mx'ing
the ULTRIX version. I did this successfully about
9 months ago.
Can't undertand why HUBwatch marketing doesn't look
at this approach in getting an OSF/1 version out
quickly.
...larry
|
| 359.5 | Now that some time has gone by... | MQOSWS::A_COURCHESNE | Un ami pour la vie... | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:24 | 12 |
| A few month have past us by since August. May be there is
less fog in our cristal ball. Can we expect HW to be available
on OpenVMS for Alpha AXP systems in a near future?
I've asked Bill, but I'm also asking here. I need an answer for
tomorrow.
Thanks in advance
Andre j. Courchesne
NAC/LENAC Sales specialistNetwork Partnet
Digital Montreal
|