| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 326.1 | Probably ok. | CSC32::B_GOODWIN | | Tue Aug 03 1993 14:09 | 13 |
| Ray,
You might want to try the DECbrouter90 conference:
kali::dewbr
But, I guess it depends on what you mean by Fractional T1. In other words, you
have a T1 mux and your want to just take a piece of that bandwidth and distribute
it to serveral devices, ie: have twenty-four 56kb links being muxed into a T1.
This shouldn't be a problem, this what the phone company does when you order
a 56kb line, they just take 24 of them and make a T1 line.
Brad
|
| 326.2 | I agree that it probably ok.. | TOOHOT::RWILSON | Once around isn't always enough | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:21 | 13 |
|
Brad,
Thanks for the respoe. My initial reaction was that it should work,
however, I thought I would ask in any case. I will also check the other
conference you mentioned.
All of a sudden I'm becoming the Router person for the Southwest.
Thanks again,
Ray W.
|
| 326.3 | True fractional T1 support | DPDMAI::DAVIES | Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:52 | 13 |
| How about true fractional T1 support? This being where you would
connect a T1 circuit to the DB90 and then tell it that it should use
Channels 3,4,88,11 to get its 256Kbps circuit.
Codex has such an offering for its bridges (says my customer). He is
just looking for a less expensive way to hook up. He says that it
costs more to strip off a specified number of channels as compared to
having true support inside the router/bridge/whatever.
Thanks,
Mark
|