T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
262.1 | Not syure how you will guarntee #2 is root | PRNSYS::LOMICKAJ | Jeffrey A. Lomicka | Mon Jun 14 1993 12:00 | 56 |
| >I am looking for a technical document that explains the Spanning Tree
>implementation on DECbridge 90. I am working on a DECHUB90 based configuration.
I don't know of a DECbridge 90 specific document. I believe the
technical manual for the LANbridge 100 or the LANbridge 200 explans the
algorithm in some detail.
>1. List of DB90 parameters that can be set to optimally configure the
> network. In the config shown below, DB90 #2 will be root bridge while DB90
> #1, #3 will be standby.
On the DECbridge 90, none of the spanning tree parameters are settable.
The "settable" part of the priority field is hard coded to be the lowest
possible priority "FF", so in a mixed environemnt with DECbridge 90 and
other bridges, the DECbridge 90 is the least favorable path. (It is
MEANT to be a leaf bridge.) In an all DECbridge 90 environment,
priority goes by station address.
You can configure the address age time, which some people consider to be
a spanning tree parameter. In most case, the correct value for this is
"0", for "never age out addresses", because in most networks, all
address table changes can be accomplished by "station migration", which
instantly responds to a station that is moved from one side of the
network to the other. See my answer to #2, below.
>2. If 90T in DEChub #2 fails, FTT will switch VAX from work-group to backbone
> side (DEChub terms). Will I have to wait till the address from forwadring
> database AGEd-out before VAX becomes accessible to the work-group again ?
No, as soon as the VAX transmits a messaage of any kind, DB90#2 will
"migrate" the VAX out of the work group address table.
> My understanding of DECbridge 90 being an End-bridge is that it will NOT
> learn addresses from backbone and the forwarding database will have addresses
> only for systems on the workgroup side.
There is a subtle semantic difference between what it "learns" and what
is stored in the address database. True, it only stores station
addresses that are on the work group side, but it actually "learns"
from both sides - in order to perform this migration function. It
learns from both sides but only remembers what is on the work group side.
> If this statement is correct and when FTT (see fig below) switched VAX to
> standby link, then VAX (see fig below) will NOT be accessible till its
> address is removed from the forwarding database. Right ? How can I make
> DB90 do that quickly so that VAX becomes accessible again.
Because of migration, this is not a problem, it will nearly instantly
migrate from the work group side to the backbone side.
Regarding the drawing:
1. I How are you wiring the DECbridge 90FL in DEChub #2 with three wires?
It only has two ports? (Or is that a DECrepeater 90FL?)
|
262.2 | Any problems with DB90 #2 root ? | HGOVC::GUPTA | | Wed Jun 16 1993 06:30 | 27 |
| Thanks Jeffery for your input. I am talking about some document which
discusses such finer points as "STATION MIGRATION" you have explained
in relpy .1. I do have Bridge & Extended LAN Manual (EK-DEBAM-HR-003) but
it does not discuss some of the parameters I get when I do "SHOW BRIDGE" -
for example EPOCH MODE and the related parameters.
DB 90 #2 (figure in .0) being root bridge - Jeffery your note seems to
suggest we cannot guarantee that DB90 #2 will be Root Bridge. Any reasons ?
I expect that DB90 #2 will be root bridge and then DB90 #3 will take over
from DB 90 #2 and DB90 #1 from DB90 #2 in case of failure. I mean that is
the intent. Will not station address be sufficient to guarantee that ?
Can you suggest me any changes in case there is likely to be any
problems ? The configuration shown in .0 will work only if at least one
DB90 is guaranteed to be active. Do you see any other problem areas ?
UB hubs have no bridges which will take part in Spanning Tree.
Yes, 90FL in DEChub #2 is DECrepeater 90FL. Just a drawing problem. The
symbol "===" was used to draw Fibre-optic cable.
Jeffery, please guide me in case you see any problems with the network
topology as shown in .0.
Thank you very much for you help.
Regards,
Surender
|
262.3 | Time for spanning tree to re-config ???? | HGOVC::GUPTA | | Fri Jun 18 1993 02:37 | 13 |
| Can anyone please help me answer the following questoins ?
1. Considering the network topology drawn in .0, can we find out the
approximate time it will take for Spanning Tree to re-configure, in
case the root bridge fails ?
2. What are the DECnet parameters that I can tune so that the active
sessions are not lost during the time the spanning tree is
re-configuring ?
Thanks and regards,
Surender
|
262.4 | Its about this long.... | CGOS01::DMARLOWE | dsk dsk dsk (tsk tsk tsk) | Fri Jun 18 1993 11:31 | 9 |
| It will take about 30 seconds for the spanning tree reconfigure
to complete. That's about how long from the failure until the yellow
lite goes out on the standby DB90 indicating that it is active.
DECNET should ride through this just fine. LAT, however will probably
not. May want to increase the retry count until failover doesn't
kill every session. May want to ask about terminal server parameter
settings in the LAT conference.
dave
|
262.5 | Hello packets on WorkGroup Port | HGOVC::GUPTA | | Wed Jun 23 1993 05:44 | 12 |
| In one of the manuals on DB90, it is written that -
"Receiving either DNA or IEEE 802.1d Hello or TCN message at the work
group port at any time will light the configuration error lamp and
place the bridge in the blocking mode"
In the configuration displayed in .0, all the three DB90s will receive
Hello on Work Group ports. Does that mean the configuration is not
valid or the above referred statement is no longer true ?
Thanks and regards,
Surender
|
262.6 | No problems; manual was obsolete!!! | HGOVC::GUPTA | | Thu Jun 24 1993 22:42 | 9 |
| The manual I was reading (being referred to in .5) is obsolete.
Hence the statement being made in .5 is no longer correct and DECbridge
90 has full spanning tree support (both IEEE & DNA).
Thank you everybody for your help.
Regards,
Surender
|
262.7 | POINTER for manuals | NAC::SEAVER | Bill Seaver, HUBwatch Mktg | Sun Jun 27 1993 23:30 | 2 |
| manuals, such as the DECbridge manual can be found in
NAC::LENAC_USER[NETWORKS.HUB.MANUALS]
|
262.8 | Spanning Tree reconfig takes 43 sec. Too much ? | HGOVC::GUPTA | | Thu Aug 05 1993 23:05 | 35 |
| Ref .4
Hello Dave,
For the configuration shown below, Spanning Tree takes about 43 seconds to
reconfigure. As there are no parameters I can tune (for better/worse), any
reason why it is taking so much time ? I am using FPROM V3.1.
Regards,
Surender
,-------------------------------------------,
LEGEND: | |
| VAX |
---- = ACTIVE LINK | | |
.... = STANDBY LINK | ,--FTT.............., |
| | . |
FTT = FAULT TOLERANT | | . |
TRANSCEIVER | | . |
90FL= FO Repeater | | . |
90FA------90FL 90T DB90-------UTP(REPEATER) UTP REPTR
| | | |#2 | |
------------------- -------------------- ---------------- -----------
DECHUB #1 | | DECHUB #2 | UB HUB #1 . UB HUB #2
DB90 #1 90T | .
. . | .
. . | .
. . | .
. DB90 #3 | .
. | 90FA .
. ---------------------------------- .
. DECHUB #3 .
`.............................................'
FIG: NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
|