T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
72.1 | Try another DB90?? | CGOS01::DMARLOWE | PDP 11: MOV -(PC),-(PC) | Wed Nov 04 1992 10:16 | 13 |
| The DB90 is listed as being able to forward 14,847 out of a possible
14,880 pps. Have you done a DISPLAY when connected to the DB90
to see what the counters are saying? Is there only one path to
the affected nodes? I have seen similar effects with running 2
DB90's in parallel and then causing one bridge to fail.
I have done DECNET loopbacks between serveral nodes each on different
sides of a DB90. Without the DB90, LTM showed very spiky in the
area of 70-75%. With the DB90, LTM showed a flat line at 69%.
I attribute this to the DB90 adding a layer of store and forward
and more collision resolution in the link.
dmm
|
72.2 | could the DELNI be the problem?? | AKOCOA::NCOLLINS | | Wed Nov 04 1992 11:40 | 11 |
| Thank you for the reply. I did try serverl different bridges.
I was just reading the documentation for the DEChub 90 Ethernet Backplane and
I noticed that nowhere do they show the use of a DELNI to connect multiple
work group hubs together. They show either the DECbridge connected directly to
a H4005 or the backplane, without the bridge, connected to a DEMPR or DESPR then
to the H4005.
Is there a reason why they don't show a configuration using DELNI's?
Norm
|
72.3 | To DELNI or not to DELNI... | CGOS01::DMARLOWE | PDP 11: MOV -(PC),-(PC) | Wed Nov 04 1992 12:44 | 13 |
| I don't know why it shouldn't work on a DELNI. Afterall I've seen
LB150s on DELNIs. I do have one customer that can't/won't connect
their 3 VAX9000s to the same DELNI. Something about loading the
DELNIs and traffic starts going astray. They have tried swapping
the DELNIs, even with new units but still no luck.
Now I'm not going to get into a long conversation about DELNIs and
how fast they should or shouldn't work.
The bottom line is that the DELNI should work but why not try it
without the DELNEI and see. You just never know. 8^)
dmm
|
72.4 | Still experimenting... | AKOCOA::NCOLLINS | | Wed Nov 11 1992 16:06 | 21 |
| Will, I have had the following configuration for the past week,
DEChub w/ repeaters ----> DEMPR ----> FOT ---> FOT ---> DB620
and so far no problems. Now with this config, I lose the capibility to use HUBwatch.
So I am also trying the following setup,
DEChub w/ repeaters & DECbridge90 using the thinwire port w/T-connector --->
>-- DEMPR ---> FOT ---> FOT ---> DB620.
Once again I am able to manage the HUB through the bridge.
I still don't know why the DELNI configuration didn't work. After looking in
various notes, checking all the rules, their seems to be no logical reason why
it didn't work.
Oh well!
Norm
|
72.5 | Put LTM on the DELNI? | MEMIT::FORREST | | Fri Nov 13 1992 08:51 | 6 |
| I'm hesitant to suggest that you mess with something that's working,
but if you're still curious about the DELNI, then you might try
putting an LTM on one of the other DELNI ports. If there's performance
or collision problems, you should be able to see it.
jack
|