T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1061.1 | Some things to try... | DYPSS1::YINGLING | Dave (N8UTX), NSIS, Dayton, OH USA | Thu May 08 1997 12:40 | 33 |
| Joe,
1. I using a PPP on a DECSERVER and having no problem. The only hint/kink
that helped me was to make sure that the DNS and WINS IP addresses were set in
the Dial-Up Networking connection icon rather than the Control
Panel->Networking route. The Exchange client requires both WINS and DNS to
work properly. Do you have WINS and DNS IP addresses assigned?
2. Assuming you are using Windows 95, a good reference for setting up
your PC is:
http://www-ccs.wro.dec.com/nt/RemoteAccess/W95Client.html
The above article will lead you through the setup. If you have the Dial-Up
Scripting tool or the ISDN Accellerator installed, I have written a script
that automates the dialog between dialing up and sending "C PPP" for a
DECSERVER. If you would like a copy, let me know.
3. I'm assuming from your symptom description (hang) that you are never
getting an initial connection to your mailbox. Again, WINS and DNS are
usually the culprits, but you could also be having a domain controller
connectivity problem caused by an improper setup/configuration. If you
modify your profile to NOT Use Network Security, you can sometimes get past
that problem. Assuming Windows 95, right click on the Inbox icon on the
desktop and select Properties. The default profile properties will be
shown. Microsoft Exchange Server should be highlighted, click on
Properties. When the Exchange Server properties window shows, click on the
Advanced tab. De-select Use Network Security During Logon.
Regards,
Dave
[email protected]
|
1061.2 | Keep Trying - PPP can work better than RAS | MK1BT1::BLAISDELL | | Thu May 08 1997 15:42 | 14 |
| .1 is a good description of the most common problems. I just want to
add that for myself I find that DECserver 700 PPP connections are far
more reliable and troublefree than RAS connections. CCS has been unable
to find any problems with my RAS setup; but two out of every three times
I try RAS my system hangs and has to be rebooted. This never happens
with the PPP connections. And I know I'm not the only one with this
problem. So keep working on your PPP connections.
Does anyone know how to get a list of all 28.8 and faster PPP numbers,
simliar to the CCS posting of RAS numbers? If it wasn't for the busy
signals I get on the DECservers I would probably never try RASing in
again.
- Bob
|
1061.3 | | PYRO::RON | Ron S. van Zuylen | Thu May 08 1997 18:53 | 17 |
| I never have problems with RAS (which, I remind you, is PPP) or DECserver
700 PPP with either Windows 95 or Windows NT Workstation. (Using
different PCs.) I never get dropped unless I disconnect myself and my
systems never "hang". I do, however, get better performance from RAS
since it supports software based compression (which is more efficient
than the modem compression and doesn't tax serial ports on either side).
If your PC is hanging, I'd seriously doubt there is something wrong
with the RAS dial-ins. With symtoms like you're having, it wouldn't be
easy to find a problem with your RAS setup. A misconfigured dialog box
won't cause your PC to hang. :-) It could be hardware... it could be
software... happy hunting.
As we're moving toward RAS and moving away from DECservers for internal
dial-ins, you'll need to get this working some day.
--Ron
|
1061.4 | Windows Password Required? | MK1BT1::BLAISDELL | | Tue May 13 1997 14:12 | 13 |
| Of course I reported the problem in .2 to CCS but I've also continued
to try different things myself while waiting for more help. The problem
is getting better.
I've never used a windows password on my home system and I'd been told
one was not necessary for RAS logon. In theory maybe not; but, I've
added a password and RAS logons are now succeeding regularly.
Note that DECserver 700 dial-ins with network logon do not require the
windows password for reliable logons, but RAS logons do. Does anyone
have an explanation for the different behavior?
- Bob
|
1061.5 | domain login/resource location | PARZVL::matrix.ogo.dec.com::kennedy | nuncam non paratus | Tue May 13 1997 15:56 | 10 |
| PPP just supplies you with a TCP/IP stack, I believe
that RAS also logs you in as a member of your Digitalx
domain.
Is it possible that the hangs you get with RAS are
because your system is trying to locate/connect to
some NT domain resources (e.g. network drives, remote
printers)? That's something that might not happen
when using PPP. I've found that some of the MS
networking does take over the machine.
|
1061.6 | No remote disk and printer connections | MK1BT1::BLAISDELL | | Tue May 13 1997 19:17 | 15 |
| re .5
"Is it possible that the hangs you get with RAS are because your system
is trying to locate/connect to some NT domain resources (e.g. network
drives, remote printers)? "
No, I do not make any such automatic resource connections. The process
and set-up for DECserver and RAS dial-ins are indentical except that
with a DECserver line I bring up a terminal window after connection to
enter the lat password and issue the CONNECT PPP command. Both
DECserver 700 and RAS numbers are set to auto login to the Digital1 NT
domain.
- Bob
|
1061.7 | Decserver setup? | FOUNDR::TOMASWICK | Joe - Enterprise Systems Engineering | Thu May 15 1997 18:48 | 9 |
|
I am still having problems. Can someone post the results
of a show port, sho port ppp ipcp, & a show port ppp lcp from a
DECserver that works with PPP & exchange?
Thanks,
Joe
|
1061.8 | | PYRO::RON | Ron S. van Zuylen | Fri May 16 1997 00:57 | 50 |
| If PPP is working correctly, all Winsock TCP/IP applications should
work... including Exchange. Anyway, here is a dump locally... where
it has always worked. Nothing special.
--Ron
TSM> SHOW PORT 1 PPP IPCP
Port 1: RSV Server: WROPPP1
IPCP Characteristics:
IPCP: Enabled
Passive Open: Disabled
Restart Timer: 3 seconds
Max Configure: 10 transmissions
Max Terminate: 2 transmissions
Max Failure: 10 transmissions
IPCP Options: Local:
Negotiate Address: Enabled
Remote IP Address: 16.60.80.201
Compress Header: Enabled
Compress States: 16
TSM> SHOW PORT 1 PPP LCP
Port 1: RSV Server: WROPPP1
LCP Characteristics:
LCP: Enabled
Passive Open: Disabled
Restart Timer: 3 seconds
Max Configure: 10 transmissions
Max Terminate: 2 transmissions
Max Failure: 10 transmissions
LCP Options: Local:
MRU: 1500
Character Map: A000
Authentication: Disabled
Link Quality: Disabled
Magic Number: Disabled
PF Compress: Enabled
ACF Compress: Enabled
FCS Size: 16 Bit
|
1061.9 | Try the .pwl file | NQOS01::16.81.32.132::ATKINS | [email protected] | Mon May 19 1997 04:11 | 11 |
| Although I never assoicated this with PPP connections I did have a problem
with the Exchange client that caused my system to hang. The cure was to delete
the c:\windows\<userid>.pwl file. This will cause you to re-enter your
password but just about everytime I have a strange Exchange problem this cures
it.
There are a couple of Technet articals on problems that a corrupt password
file will cause.
Thanks,
Steve
|
1061.10 | CRC errors will definitely hang MS-Exchange | PTOSS1::BREZLER | | Fri May 23 1997 22:46 | 21 |
| I am a telecommuter and dial in daily to a DECserver700
(BL10-40...whatever that means..). Until about three months ago I was
running W95 on a Celebris GL5133. I was getting Exchange hangups but
had no idea why. I moved to WNT about three months ago and again
started to see hangups on Exchange. One of the tools in the WNT bag is
the Dial-Up Networking Monitor. It gives you the ability to see a
variety of device errors if they occur. I noticed that when I got a CRC
error while using Exchange, it would freeze. The only way to get it to
come back was to hangup and redial, or use Ctrl-Alt-Del and end the
Exchange task and restart it. With a 5 minute Exchage start up this
became a pain in the ******. So I have played with tracking the ports
on the DECserver that give me the most CRC errors and keep trying
during the day to use one that is less error prone. I also use my ISP
when the errors get so bad I want to pull my hair out. There errors
have little-to-no effect on my use of Netscape and KEA (my terminal
emulator). I wish I could find some setting that would eliminate this
problem but for the time being I'm living with it. It certainly
contributes to a non-productive environment. CCS has not been able to
help......
Any input would be welcome.....
|
1061.11 | RAS vs DECserver vs file share access problem | ZEKE::BLAISDELL | | Wed Jun 04 1997 20:48 | 14 |
|
Yesterday morning I dialed in from home to check mail. I store my
personal address book and personal folders on an NT file share.
I dialed into one RAS service, invoked exchange and my system froze up.
So I rebooted, dialed a different RAS number and again my system froze
up. The third time I dialed into a DECserver, connected PPP and invoked
Exchange. I was notified that my personal address book could not be
accessed and asked if I wanted to proceed. Said yes and I proceeded to
read new mail.
Why the different behaviour using the DECserver?
- Bob
|
1061.12 | | BUSY::SLAB | Audiophiles do it 'til it hertz! | Wed Jun 04 1997 21:04 | 7 |
|
The Exchange server might have "fixed" itself between the second
and third attempts, when you just happened to change connection
options.
Might just be a coincidence.
|
1061.13 | no domain authentication? | PARZVL::ogodhcp-124-40-168.ogo.dec.com::kennedy | nuncam non paratus | Wed Jun 04 1997 21:07 | 3 |
| perhaps you couldn't get to the address book because
you hadn't logged into the domain (which I think gets
done automatically when you use RAS).
|
1061.14 | Exchange Server Problems Also? | ZEKE::BLAISDELL | | Wed Jun 04 1997 21:40 | 15 |
| re .12
> The Exchange server might have "fixed" itself between the second
> and third attempts, when you just happened to change connection
> options.
Are you suggesting that there were also problems with the Exchange
server for the first two connect attempts? Maybe I'm giving the
infrastructure too much "credit" and it is even more fragile than than I
thought. On the DECserver dial-in I was obviously able to reach the
Exchange server and I am assuming there never was a problem with it.
And, regardless of the problem, my PC locked up and that's a problem
regardless.
- Bob
|
1061.15 | DECserver & RAS dial-ins, insignificant differences | ZEKE::BLAISDELL | | Wed Jun 04 1997 21:48 | 12 |
| re .13
> perhaps you couldn't get to the address book because you hadn't logged
> into the domain (which I think gets done automatically when you use
> RAS).
The DECserver dial-in is also set to automatically log into the NT
domain. In normal operation I see no difference between DECserver and
RAS dial-ins except a short stop at the lat prompt to issue the connect
PPP command.
- Bob
|
1061.16 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Wed Jun 04 1997 22:30 | 4 |
| However, lately I am noticing that the PC-clock synchronization is noo longer
done when you comein via DECserver dial-in on the ZK3 boxes.
- Vikas
|
1061.17 | | BUSY::SLAB | Audiophiles do it 'til it hertz! | Wed Jun 04 1997 22:46 | 10 |
|
Yeah, I changed to DNS/WINS last week and was getting an NT logon
script when I connected via RAS [and would reconnect two network
drives ... one for .PST/.PAB files and the other for my area on
the NT server] but I haven't seen that all week. But the drives
do get reconnected.
This is at MRO, connecting to a Shrewsbury MA number, in case it
matters.
|
1061.18 | DNS/WINS | PYRO::RON | Ron S. van Zuylen | Thu Jun 05 1997 00:25 | 7 |
| Remember, RAS sets your primary/secondary DNS and WINS automatically...
you don't set anything. DECserver PPP doesn't... and you need to specify
them in the properties for the specific dial-out. (DECserver PPP also
doesn't support the advanced software based compression that RAS has...
but that is behind the scenes stuff.)
--Ron
|
1061.19 | What's working and what's not ??? | PTOSS1::BREZLER | | Thu Jun 05 1997 00:53 | 9 |
| So are we saying that we do get the MS-Exchange client lockup on
dialing in thru DS700's and we don't using RAS? Is anyone using RAS
experiencing this lockup symptom? Is anyone using dial-up thru DS700's
getting a rock solid MS-Exchange client performance with no lock-up's?
Can we get some stats from the dial-up user community?
Gil
|
1061.20 | Upside Down | ZEKE::BLAISDELL | | Thu Jun 05 1997 01:30 | 14 |
| re .19
> So are we saying that we do get the MS-Exchange client lockup on
> dialing in thru DS700's and we don't using RAS? Is anyone using RAS
> experiencing this lockup symptom? Is anyone using dial-up thru DS700's
> getting a rock solid MS-Exchange client performance with no lock-up's?
My note describes the opposite behaviour. On the DECserver connection I
am gracefully told that the file share is not available (that my PAB
cannot be accessed) and then I can proceeed to use the exchange server.
On the RAS connection, Exchange appears to take over my PC and I have
to reboot.
- Bob
|
1061.21 | Meaning What? | ZEKE::BLAISDELL | | Thu Jun 05 1997 01:43 | 12 |
| re .18
> (DECserver PPP also
> doesn't support the advanced software based compression that RAS has...
> but that is behind the scenes stuff.)
I wouldn't know about this but are you implying that RAS performance
should be better than DECserver 700 connections? Is this theory or fact?
It is certainly not my experience. What other factors affect relative
performance?
- Bob
|