[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference chefs::ms-exchange

Title:Microsoft Exchange Server
Notice:
Moderator:FLASK2::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 17 1995
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Thu Jun 05 1997
Number of topics:1099
Total number of notes:5174

1007.0. "One more time - Telnet/Dumb terminal access to Exchange mail" by EPS::DEANE () Wed Apr 16 1997 19:54

I'm looking for a way to read my Exchange mail from a
command line/dumb terminal. I already scanned this notesfile
and found note 245 and note 559. As the noter in 559 said:

	"The sort of thing I am thinking of would allow you
	to Telnet into a (WNT V4.0) server and then"... "run
	something to access your mail."

I KNOW that I would not be able to read anything but text,
but considering that text mail messages are about 95% of what
I get via mail, I'd be happy not being able to read the
other 5%.

Anyone know of any third party products out there?




Tom Deane, Application Systems Engineering Performacne Group
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1007.1BUSY::SLABCrash, burn ... when will I learn?Wed Apr 16 1997 20:287
    
    	Set up an Inbox Assistant and forward all of your incoming Exchange
    	mail to a VMS or All-IN-1 account.
    
    	But why did you start a new note instead of adding a reply to the
    	[heh ... "the"?  There are already two of them] existing note?
    
1007.2Interesting workaround, but...EPS::DEANEThu Apr 17 1997 16:5514
re: .1

>    	Set up an Inbox Assistant and forward all of your incoming Exchange
>    	mail to a VMS or All-IN-1 account.

Thanks. Interesting workaround. But it's not what I really want. I want ALL my mail
sent to one, and only one, place. I want to be able to read it from multiple
places. I don't want to have to go into Exchange after I've read the "forwarded
mail" on VMS or All-in-1 and have to re-read and re-manage it a second time. 

Know of a third party or midnight project that does what I want it to do?


Tom
1007.3AXEL::FOLEYhttp://axel.zko.dec.comThu Apr 17 1997 22:178
RE: .2,.0

	When Exchange 5.0 comes up on the CCS servers, you'll be
	able to get at your mail with a POP3 client. I'll leave it up
	to you on finding a text based POP3 client. I'm sure there is
	one.

							mike
1007.4HELIX::SONTAKKEFri Apr 18 1997 17:233
    POP3 does NOT satisfy that requirement.  IMAP4 does though.
    
    You don't have centralized mail if you are using POP3.
1007.5Refiling available in some POP3 serversTHEBAY::WIEGLEBLast day is May 2. Farewell!Fri Apr 18 1997 22:5411
    Actually, a number of POP3 servers allow you to just read a mail
    message from the server without deleting it as well.  Some of the more
    sophisticated ones will just refile your messages into a "Seen" or
    "Read" folder after you've read them from the POP3 client so that you
    won't retrieve them a second time from the POP3 client and can still
    get at the messages from alternate clients later.
    
    I think Innosoft PMDF and perhaps UCX (Digital TCP/IP Services) allow
    this type of configuration.
    
    - Dave
1007.6CIRCUS::GOETZETibetan karma not Made in ChinaSat Apr 19 1997 00:027
    The other problem with forwarding (at least the way I have my Exchange
    mail setup) is that the originating addresses are lost; all I can see
    are the full names of the sender and recipients. If I get much mail
    from Smiths, it's a guessing game how to reply to them. Not very
    useful.
    
       erik
1007.7AXEL::FOLEYhttp://axel.zko.dec.comMon Apr 21 1997 15:355
RE: .5

	Fixed in Exchange 5.0.

							mike
1007.8You CAN leave your message up on the server...JULIET::HARRIS_MANetworks Sales ExecMon Apr 21 1997 20:0510
    I have an ISP who provides POP3 mail to me, and I configured it to
    leave all the messages ON THE SERVER, so that I can access it
    flawlessly from Netscape Internet MAIL, or Microsoft Internet Mail,
    etc. Interchangeably.
    
    Presumably, Exchange 5 server will act the same way, allowing some
    cell-based POP mail client to talk to it ?// I think so anyway...
    
    Mark