T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
913.1 | Should work but not particularily well | FLASK2::SYSTEM | Nigel Bridport @REO | Tue Mar 04 1997 10:07 | 12 |
| Hi Mike,
Exchange really requires 64Mb memory to run efficiently. You
would get some benefit from adding a little extra to your 32Mb
system.
You don't really say how much disk space you have ? In the real
world, Exchange is split over a number of disks. Also, are you
intending to run any other products on the system apart from NT
and Exchange.
Nige.
|
913.2 | | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Tue Mar 04 1997 11:42 | 13 |
|
I'll be using it as my PC but most of the time I expect Exchange won't
be running. We're developing Mailbus Monitor for NT which will monitor
Exchange. So it'll be a case of me wanting to test something, starting
up Mailbus Monitor, starting up Exchange and carrying out some tests.
I have just a 2Gb disk at the moment but I dual boot so there isn't
that much space on the NT side. I was hoping to just put Exchange on
the one new disk, do you think that I need to spread it a little so that it
won't die?
Thanks,
Mike
|
913.3 | | FLASK2::SYSTEM | Nigel Bridport @REO | Wed Mar 05 1997 07:13 | 5 |
|
It is normally best to spread Exchange for performance reasons but
I have been successfully running Exchange V4.0 on a single disk.
Nige.
|
913.4 | | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Mon Mar 10 1997 23:06 | 7 |
|
Well the 64mb and the extra 2gb is in.
I'll next upgrade from NT V4.0 to NT v4.0 Service pack 2 and go from there.
I'll report back here for others future reference.
Mike
|
913.5 | | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Thu Mar 20 1997 17:45 | 6 |
|
Just an update. Exchange v5.0 is installed and working fine. I've
even got it working with MB400 in just one day. Wow I must be
learning.
Mike
|