| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1100.1 | MWC is not Ansi C | OLDTMR::WALLACE | | Sat Mar 23 1991 23:35 | 3 |
| Mark Williams is not.
Ray
|
| 1100.2 | Thanx! | STKHLM::ARENDI | Jaak Arendi TSC/VIA | Sun Mar 24 1991 13:49 | 1 |
|
|
| 1100.3 | Prospero PRO-C IS ANSI | BAGELS::FELDMAN | Jerry Feldman DTN 226-5271 | Mon Mar 25 1991 11:12 | 1 |
| The only ST C compiler which I know is ANSI is Prospero PRO-C.
|
| 1100.4 | HiSoft Lattice should also be ANSI-C. | STKHLM::ARENDI | Jaak Arendi TSC/VIA | Tue Mar 26 1991 12:53 | 8 |
| I was in a store today and they claimed that Lattice-C from HiSoft also
is an ANSI-C compiler. (?)
Jack
PS. It was expensive anyway almost �200.
|
| 1100.5 | Lattice also had fixed stack size | BAGELS::FELDMAN | Jerry Feldman DTN 226-5271 | Wed Mar 27 1991 09:45 | 11 |
| While I have not used a recent version of Lattice, one of the main
problems I saw with Lattice as a language for developing applications
is that the stack size adjustment was performed at RUN time. This is
not really an acceptable feature. Most other C compilers allow the
developer to specify stack size at compile time by setting a global
variable, or at link time by linking in a different startup module.
Lattice (version 3.x) provided neither capability. Therefore, the
resultant module, when loaded, took most of the available memory, which
rendered malloc almost useless.
|
| 1100.6 | Turbo-C/ST is ANSI! | COL01::BOEHM | Irren ist m�nnlich | Mon Apr 29 1991 08:11 | 9 |
| Re: < Note 1100.3 by BAGELS::FELDMAN "Jerry Feldman DTN 226-5271" >
> The only ST C compiler which I know is ANSI is Prospero PRO-C.
Wrong! BORLAND Turbo C for ATARI-ST is ANSI too. Since V1.0. Current
Version is 2.03.
Regards. / Hilmar.
|
| 1100.7 | Can we get a thumbnail review? | VFOVAX::PATTERSON | The world is flat, it's the universe thats round | Tue Apr 30 1991 17:01 | 13 |
| > Wrong! BORLAND Turbo C for ATARI-ST is ANSI too. Since V1.0. Current
> Version is 2.03.
Does anyone use Turbo C? I am real interested in knowing how
it works?
What kind of speed?
Code size?
Compiler Speed?
Jim
|
| 1100.8 | I'm using it - great ! | FROCKY::ECKEL | | Wed Sep 25 1991 09:46 | 11 |
| I use Turbo C 2.0 since about 1.5 years. Speed is best i've ever seen
on the ST. Possibilities to configure stack size (as mentioned in one
of the replies above) is given. Furthermore you can customize such
things like Optimization, ANSI yes/no, Automatic use of register
variables etc.pp.
Also available there is a source level debugger of similar quality and
versability. And, it has quite few bugs, related to any other C product
for the ST.
regards, Peter.
|