| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 903.1 | Read the STreport! | UKCSSE::KEANE | | Tue Jun 19 1990 04:09 | 11 |
|
hi,
there was a report comparing the nec with the lynx in the STREPORT a
couple of weeks ago. The author was very impressed with the nec and
very biased against the Lynx. So I dont know how much credance to put
on it.
cheers
Pat K.
|
| 903.2 | Copies? | FASDER::AHERB | | Wed Jun 20 1990 23:07 | 1 |
| How can I get a copy of report?
|
| 903.3 | ITS IN THE NOTES! | UKCSSE::KEANE | | Thu Jun 21 1990 04:21 | 11 |
|
Hi,
AS stated in another couple of notes in this note file, you can copy
STreport and Znet from :
QARRY::DISK$USER:[BHAMILTON.PUBLIC]streport.txt,znet.txt
cheers
Pat K.
|
| 903.4 | | QARRY::BHAMILTON | Buzz Hamilton | Thu Jun 21 1990 09:05 | 3 |
| More specifically:
$ COPY QARRY::DISK$USER:[BHAMILTON.PUBLIC]STREPORT.623 []
|
| 903.5 | But .... | RDGENG::JYERKESS | SLS ? It's elementary Watson | Sat Aug 04 1990 09:54 | 14 |
| I bought the LYNX some months ago because I couldn't wait for the NEC
portable and now I believe that I did the right thing. The LYNX has
one advantage over NECs machine which may prove to be important,
where as the PC Engine portable was designed as a normal games console
and then modified so that it could all fit in a small box with a
miniature TV screen, the LYNX was designed as a portable and so are
the games. The far greater graphics resolution of the PC Engine is not
needed on such a small screen and this amounts to wasted memory and
also requires more processing power to animate the higher resolution
graphics. In my opinion as a portable the LYNX is capable of far
better things than NECs little wonder.
Jeff
|