T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
78.1 | not (yet) built in | SUOSW1::KAISER | Holy St. Asap ! | Fri May 06 1988 04:54 | 8 |
| I have a MEGA ST for about 7 weeks now and this one has not been shipped
with a Blitter. Last week I asked my dealer when they would get them.
The answer was: "We're actually getting blitters from time to time, but not
the amounts we need for our sold MEGAs. So we call the people in the order
the bought their MEGAs to bring the machines to us to build the chip in."
They said in about 1 or 2 months it'll be my turn.
-Hans
|
78.2 | | LDP::WEAVER | Laboratory Data Products | Fri May 06 1988 19:34 | 5 |
| I discussed the performance back in an old note in the December
1987 timeframe in the old conference. My Mega 2 didn't come with
one, but I had it within a few days when I upgraded back in December.
-Dave
|
78.3 | BLITTER's REVISITED | KERNEL::GILLESPIE | | Mon Dec 19 1988 10:40 | 17 |
|
Yet another visit to this question.
Does anyone know the answer to the following questions.
1: Are BLITTERCHIPS available now or not.?
2: The 520STFM, has a socket for the BLITTERCHIP YES or NO.?
3: If the chips are available, how much and from whom.?
Thanks in advance any info gratefully received.
Nat.G.
|
78.4 | blitter mania | CIMBAD::POWERS | I Dream Of Wires - G. Numan | Mon Dec 19 1988 10:45 | 21 |
|
RE: .3
> 1: Are BLITTERCHIPS available now or not.?
They are not available.
> 2: The 520STFM, has a socket for the BLITTERCHIP YES or NO.?
They do not
> 3: If the chips are available, how much and from whom.?
> Nat.G.
Bill Powers
|
78.5 | Really No Sockets for BLITTER | KERNEL::GILLESPIE | | Tue Dec 20 1988 05:42 | 16 |
|
RE: .4
Thanks for quick response, now confused with regards to:
> 2: The 520STFM, has a socket for the BLITTERCHIP YES or NO.?
>> They do not
If the chips ar'nt available then this is academic, but
nevertheless, at least two colleaques I talked with have indicated
that the new REV of 520/1040 system board have a socket for the
BLITTER, anyone else care to comment.
Nat.G.
|
78.6 | Blit on ROM ?? | RDGENG::KEANE | | Tue Dec 20 1988 10:10 | 13 |
| Hi Nat,
I thought that there was confusion over this issue before. The theory
that came out then was that there was an empty socket on some revs
of PCB, but it was for an extra, (different size?) , TOS ROM.
Atari work in wonderous ways, so who knows. Hey why is it the cursor
has just vanished from this note reply. It's jolly hard typing without
it!!
Cheers
Pat K
|
78.7 | Huh? | DEMING::HLQAR | | Thu Dec 22 1988 07:18 | 5 |
|
Pardon my ignorance ... but what is a blitter chip?
Speedo the Confused
|
78.8 | Blitter ? | DISCVR::FISTER | Pardon, my DMA isn't working... | Thu Dec 22 1988 07:49 | 12 |
|
A Blitter is a hardware reality of an old software method. It
moves large amounts of info around the microproccesor instead of
through it.
The Atari blitter is used for screen info, giving faster display
output. When I picked up my Mega2, I was impressed by the speed
difference.
...until I found that the blitter was off. In my opinion, I
have never seen an earth-shattering difference with or without.
Les
|
78.9 | Oh, THAT blitter chip ... | DEMING::HLQAR | | Thu Dec 22 1988 08:10 | 9 |
|
So, you mean to say that it acts like a dedicated microprocessor
(or _is_ one)? That's not such a bad idea; I'm surprised that it
had little impact on your machine's performance. I supose that
it would depend on how fast this chip runs. Does anyone have any
specific information (read 'data specs') on them? I had never heard
of them before today, and would like to hear more about them.
Speedo the Enlightened
|
78.10 | | BOLT::MINOW | Repent! Godot is coming soon! Repent! | Sun Dec 25 1988 19:24 | 19 |
| To put the graphics on the screen, you need to do a number of bit-level
data transfers. They are fairly difficult (computationally) as the two
pieces of data might not be byte-aligned. This means you are continually
shifting, bit-testing, bit-munging. (The Atari-ST gets some speed for
mono-spaced text by defining its characters to be 8-bits wide, but nothing
helps proportionally-spaced text.)
The operations are collectively called Blit's (bit-block-transfers).
The best description (and sample code) I've found is in the Smalltalk
manuals. I suspect there are others, of course.
The Blitter, I am told, implements the shift/logical-op/shift/write
using dedicated hardware. It should be faster, especially if it can
clip the writing to the window structure (probably not the case).
You might be able to find a spec of the Atari Blitter's capabilities
in the developer's documentation (or by digging through the notesfile).
Martin.
|